Is there a complete transcript of Donald Trump's 2006 Howard Stern interview?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
There is a publicly available, complete written transcript of at least one of Donald Trump’s 2006 appearances on The Howard Stern Show: news and archive sites have published full transcripts of the February 27, 2006 and October 10, 2006 interviews (and other nearby dates) drawn from archived recordings and fact‑checking repositories [1] [2]. What is less uniform is the provenance of those transcripts — whether they are official station transcripts, third‑party transcriptions or reconstructions from audio — and access to original Sirius/XM audio has at times been restricted [3] [4].
1. What exists and where it’s hosted
Complete verbatim transcripts of Trump’s Stern appearances in 2006 are available on archive/factbase sites: Roll Call’s Factbase hosts a full transcript of the October 10, 2006 interview (labeled and posted by that outlet) and Factba.se publishes a February 27, 2006 transcript with sentence and word counts for each speaker [2] [1]. Those pages present conversational turns, quotations and even speaker word counts, signalling that they are more than short excerpts — they aim to reproduce the interviews in full [2] [1]. Independent collections such as “Trump on Stern” have also aggregated multiple Trump‑Stern appearances, offering transcripts and audio where they could locate them [4].
2. Audio availability vs. transcript reliability
While full written transcriptions exist online, the original audio has been subject to removals and variable access: TrumpOnStern.com collected recordings but was ordered to take down audio by Sirius/XM at one point, and that affects the ability to cross‑check every transcription against primary audio on a single official platform [3] [4]. The transcript pages themselves do not always carry station branding that proves they are the radio network’s official transcripts, so scholars and reporters typically treat them as reliable reproductions but note they were produced by third parties that transcribed archived recordings [1] [2].
3. How these transcripts have been used in reporting and fact checks
Major news organizations and fact‑checkers have used the archived transcripts or the resurfaced audio clips to report specific lines from the 2006 interviews — for example, CNN cited the October 2006 interview on topics including comments about Ivanka Trump’s appearance, and Snopes authenticated a viral clip from a February 2006 show where Trump appears to respond to being called a “sexual predator” [5] [6]. Mashable and Newsweek‑sourced compilations also leaned on the transcriptions to extract notable quotes during the 2016 campaign and in later decades when clips resurfaced [7]. Those uses implicitly confirm the existence of full transcriptions even as debate continued about context and precise wording.
4. Caveats, provenance and how to verify
The presence of full transcripts on Roll Call/Factbase and Factba.se constitutes a public record of the interviews’ content, but researchers should note provenance limitations: the sites are third‑party archives rather than the original broadcast’s transcript repository, and audio availability has been inconsistent because Sirius/XM has at times restricted reposting of Stern material [2] [1] [3]. For absolute verification of any specific sentence, one should compare the posted transcript to the original broadcast audio where accessible or to multiple independent transcriptions — news outlets and fact‑checkers (CNN, Snopes) relied on those cross‑checks when amplifying excerpts [5] [6].
5. Bottom line
Yes — complete transcripts of Donald Trump’s 2006 Howard Stern interviews are publicly accessible via archived transcription repositories (for example the October 10, 2006 transcript on Roll Call and the February 27, 2006 transcript on Factba.se) [2] [1]. However, the transcripts on third‑party archive sites should be treated as transcriptions of broadcast audio rather than as station‑issued official documents, and original audio access for independent confirmation can be uneven because of take‑down actions and rights controls [3] [4].