Are there other alleged sexual misconduct settlements involving Donald J. Trump and their years?
Executive summary
Multiple reported settlements and judgments involving allegations of sexual misconduct by Donald J. Trump include a $5 million judgment in E. Jean Carroll’s case — a jury verdict in May 2023 that was later upheld on appeal (reported upheld on Dec. 30, 2024 and June 13, 2025) [1] [2]. Other reporting and compilations mention many civil claims and settlements in Trump’s broader legal history, but available sources provided here do not list a comprehensive, independently verified catalogue of other specific sexual‑misconduct settlement amounts and years beyond Carroll [2] [3].
1. The central, documented case: E. Jean Carroll’s $5 million verdict
The clearest, repeatedly reported civil judgment tied to an allegation of sexual abuse is the E. Jean Carroll verdict: a May 2023 jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation and ordered $5 million in damages; that judgment was appealed and reported as being upheld on multiple occasions in late 2024 and mid‑2025 [1] [2]. News outlets later described Trump seeking Supreme Court review of that $5 million judgment [4]. This Carroll case is the focal, well‑documented civil award in the material supplied.
2. What the supplied sources say about other settlements or payouts
The provided sources point to a crowded legal history for Trump — with many lawsuits, settlements and judgments across business, media and personal‑conduct matters — but they do not produce a clear, corroborated list of other sexual‑misconduct settlements with dates and amounts in the way the Carroll case is documented [2] [3]. One marketplace piece mentions many settlement figures tied to Trump‑related litigation more broadly (e.g., media cases) but does not attribute a specific additional sexual‑misconduct settlement amount or year [5]. Available sources do not mention a definitive roster of other sexual‑misconduct settlement years beyond the Carroll litigation [2] [3].
3. Conflicting or broad compilations: treat with caution
Compilations and summaries found in general web posts and partisan aggregations frequently assert “dozens” of allegations and sometimes suggest multiple settlements, but these sources vary sharply in sourcing and reliability [3]. The Wikipedia entry aggregates many allegations and references judgments upheld on appeal but mixes allegations, civil jury findings and other legal actions; it should not be treated as a stand‑alone primary source without following its citations [2]. In short, broader lists exist but their claims about settled sexual‑misconduct suits and precise years require verification beyond the snippets provided.
4. What is confirmed and repeatedly reported in the record supplied
Confirmed in the documents you supplied: a May 2023 jury verdict finding Trump liable to E. Jean Carroll for sexual abuse and defamation and awarding $5 million; appellate rulings upholding that judgment in late 2024 and mid‑2025; and subsequent filings by Trump seeking Supreme Court review of the Carroll verdict [1] [2] [4]. Those are the specific, dated legal outcomes tied to sexual‑misconduct allegations that the provided reporting details.
5. Limits of the available reporting and how to proceed
The supplied sources acknowledge many accusations (dozens of women accused Trump across decades) but do not, in themselves, enumerate other sexual‑misconduct settlements with amounts and years comparable to the Carroll case [2]. If you want a comprehensive list with verified amounts and dates, the next step is to consult primary court records, contemporaneous major‑media reporting on each named suit, or the source citations behind the Wikipedia compilation; the current document set does not contain that level of verified, itemized detail [2] [1] [3].
6. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas in the sources
Different sources carry different priorities: long‑form lists and partisan blogs aim for breadth and advocacy and may aggregate allegations and settlements without consistent sourcing [3]; aggregated encyclopedic pages (Wikipedia) summarize many claims but depend on external citations and can conflate allegations, settlements and judgments unless checked [2]. Major news outlets reporting on Carroll focus on courtroom findings and appeals, producing the most judicially grounded record in the materials provided [1] [4]. Recognize these agenda and reliability differences when evaluating any claimed “other settlements.”
If you’d like, I can take the next step and try to extract the underlying citations from the Wikipedia entry and the compilations you provided to build a sourced timeline of other alleged settlements or court outcomes — but that will require consulting the linked primary articles and court filings beyond the snippets you shared.