What were Donald Trump's most explicit comments on Howard Stern's show?

1. Why the Stern tapes matter: decades of lewd talk that shaped public view

Howard Stern conducted more than 20 interviews with Donald Trump since the 1990s, creating an archival record that journalists and fact‑checkers later mined for explicit content; these appearances are significant because they present Trump speaking candidly in a nonpolitical media environment, and reporters have repeatedly highlighted sexually explicit and demeaning comments as central to public debates about his character ^{[4] [6]}. Coverage in 2016 and later assembled clips emphasized remarks where Trump discussed sexual encounters, three‑ways, and attractiveness standards, producing viral excerpts that fueled criticism during his political campaigns and were used by opponents to illustrate a pattern of misogynistic language ^{[1] [2]}.

2. The most widely reported explicit claims: what Trump actually said on air

Multiple accounts identify recurring explicit themes: Trump boasted about sexual experiences and preferences, made vulgar assessments of women’s bodies, and discussed age and consent boundaries in ways that many outlets labeled lewd; notable citations include his saying he had no problem dating 24‑year‑olds and minimizing age constraints, and his remark calling his daughter Ivanka a “piece of a**” when prompted on air—these are documented in reporting and transcript summaries that compile Stern interviews ^{[3] [2]}. Journalistic pieces and archived interviews corroborate that these comments were repeated across interviews, creating a pattern rather than isolated slips, and news outlets have cited them when assessing his public persona ^{[6] [2]}.

3. Context disputes and authenticity checks: does video and timing change the meaning?

Some specific clips prompted authenticity and context investigations: a 2006 video showing Trump allegedly smiling after being called a “sexual predator” was examined by fact‑checkers who confirmed the clip’s genuineness while noting conversational context that included joking and banter—yet confirmation of authenticity did not neutralize the clip’s impact because the tone and nonchalant response amplified public concern ^[5]. Other reports pointed out that Trump’s citations of scandals or ages contained factual inaccuracies when aired—for example, his misleading reference to Congressman Mark Foley’s case and pages’ ages—showing that explicit comments sometimes mixed with incorrect or exaggerated claims ^[3].

4. What journalists and hosts said afterward: Stern’s reaction and media framing

Howard Stern and other media figures later reflected on those interviews; Stern acknowledged the long relationship and explained why Trump turned on him at times, while outlets like Newsweek and GQ traced how Stern’s candid format led to material that later became politically and culturally consequential ^{[4] [7]}. Reporting emphasized that Stern’s approach—eliciting raw, unfiltered stories—produced material that was both newsworthy and combustible, and journalists debated whether the context of entertainment radio changes the interpretive frame for evaluating moral or political character when such comments resurface during campaigns ^{[4] [7]}.

5. The broader factual takeaways and contested interpretations

Fact‑checking and reporting converge on several established points: Trump repeatedly made explicit, sexualized, and sometimes demeaning remarks on Stern’s show across many years; some specific clips required authentication and contextual clarification, but none of the major outlets cited here retracted the core content claims that these remarks occurred ^{[1] [5] [2]}. Disputes center on interpretation—whether the banteral, entertainment context mitigates culpability—and on selective presentation of clips; sources document both the raw comments and the media processes that amplified them, leaving the factual record as a set of confirmed explicit statements with contested public meanings ^{[1] [6] [2]}.