What did Dr. Mehmet Oz say about Apex Force products and on what TV dates did he mention them?

1. What the claim actually says — and why it matters: verifying a named product and TV dates

The original claim names a specific product line, Apex Force, and asks for the content and TV dates of Dr. Oz’s remarks. That is a straightforward, evidenceable assertion: if Oz spoke about a branded product on television, broadcast records, episode guides, transcripts, or contemporaneous press coverage should document it. A review of the supplied materials finds no reference to Apex Force and no episode-level dates linking Oz to any explicit endorsement of that brand. The available materials instead discuss general supplement endorsements, undercover tests of private‑label supplements, and social media influencer concerns, leaving the Apex Force claim unsubstantiated on the supplied evidence ^{[1] [2] [4]}.

2. What the sources do confirm about Oz and supplements — pattern rather than product

Multiple sources corroborate a clear pattern: Dr. Oz has promoted weight‑loss and herbal supplement products and has been the subject of scrutiny for endorsements and the accuracy of product labeling. Reporting shows Oz’s endorsements of items like green coffee bean extract, raspberry ketone, garcinia cambogia, and weight‑loss gummies, and watchdog groups have flagged potential FTC disclosure issues with his social‑media promotions. Investigations of third parties selling supplements using Oz’s name found products lacking labeled active ingredients. These revelations document a consistent association with supplement promotion but not the Apex Force brand or specific TV air dates linking him to that brand ^{[1] [2] [3] [7] [9]}.

3. Attempts to locate TV-date evidence — episode guides and broadcast records don’t help

The supplied episode guides and show histories for The Dr. Oz Show and related bios do not include product‑level mentions or date‑stamped endorsements for Apex Force. General program histories provide air dates, formats, and episode counts but do not list every product mention, and the documents in hand do not show any episode transcript or promotion referencing Apex Force. Where sources investigate specific companies or products, they document undercover tests and consumer‑protection concerns, but again no TV dates or Apex Force references appear in the materials provided ^{[4] [5] [6] [2]}.

4. Divergent perspectives in the record — watchdogs, critics, and defenses

The supplied materials reveal different framings: watchdog and consumer‑advocacy reporting emphasize lack of disclosure, misleading promotion, and product mislabeling; investigative pieces document failed lab tests for some private‑label supplements and warn consumers about extreme claims. Podcast and critical coverage portray Oz as a “supplement spin doctor,” highlighting long‑standing controversies. None of the materials present a direct defense from Apex Force (since Apex Force is not mentioned), and the disparate sources indicate an agenda toward consumer protection in watchdog pieces and skeptical critique in journalistic and podcast commentary ^{[1] [8] [9]}.

5. Bottom line, missing evidence, and how to verify the claim

Based on the supplied sources, the claim that Dr. Oz said anything about Apex Force products on specific TV dates is unsupported: no document in the reviewed set mentions Apex Force or records TV‑date mentions. To verify such a claim rigorously, consult primary broadcast records, official episode transcripts from The Dr. Oz Show, network archive search tools, or contemporaneous media coverage that cites episode and air dates. Consumer‑protection filings or press releases from Apex Force (if they exist) could also show when and where a brand was discussed; none of these appear in the provided materials ^{[1] [2] [4]}.

6. What readers should take away — accuracy, provenance, and next steps

Treat the Apex Force allegation as unverified until primary evidence is produced. The available record shows Dr. Oz’s broader involvement in promoting supplements and the controversies that flow from that activity, but it does not substantiate branded claims tied to Apex Force or specify TV air dates. If you need definitive proof, request episode transcripts or network logs for the time frame in question, or provide additional primary sources that explicitly name Apex Force; otherwise, the responsible conclusion is that the assertion cannot be confirmed with the supplied documentation ^{[1] [7] [9]}.