Has Dr. Phil issued any public statements or endorsements clarifying his relationship to Sugar Clean products?

1. Product listings and customer reviews prominently use “Dr. Phil” in branding

Multiple Trustpilot pages and product-review aggregations in the supplied reporting present supplements labeled with Dr. Phil’s name—titles and snippets repeatedly reference “Sugar Clean Drops Dr Phil,” “Dr. Phil Sugar Control,” and similar branding, indicating the marketplace association between the product and the celebrity name ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

2. Consumers report seeing Dr. Phil in ads and allege direct ties, but those are second‑hand claims

Several Trustpilot reviewers assert they saw advertisements featuring Dr. Phil (and sometimes Dr. Oz) or that billing and ordering were tied to those promoted offers; those user complaints describe perceived endorsements or ad appearances but are user-generated and not corroborated by a quoted statement from Dr. Phil in the provided material ^{[3] [4]}.

3. Complaints allege deceptive marketing and billing practices but do not substitute for a celebrity’s statement

Some reviewers accuse the vendors of deceptive ordering practices—unexpected charges, triple orders, and difficulty obtaining refunds—and some explicitly name Dr. Phil as part of the marketing narrative; these are consumer allegations about how the product was sold and perceived, not documented public clarifications or endorsements from Dr. Phil himself ^{[4] [3]}.

4. Positive user reviews cite the “Dr. Phil” product label but still do not include his voice

Other Trustpilot entries describe reasonable experiences with the drops and refer to the product using Dr. Phil’s name in their reviews; those testimonials reflect user perceptions of efficacy or presentation but do not constitute an official statement or verified endorsement by Dr. Phil ^{[1] [5] [2]}.

5. No primary-source statement from Dr. Phil appears in the provided collection of reporting

Across the provided pages—consumer review platforms and secondary “deep dive” or guide pages—there is no direct quote, press release, legal filing text, or verified social-media post attributed to Dr. Phil clarifying whether he created, endorses, is affiliated with, or has licensed his name to the Sugar Clean products; the supplied materials do not contain a primary statement from him on this matter ^{[4] [3] [1] [6]}.

6. Alternative explanations and potential agendas in the sources

The public material suggests two plausible alternative dynamics: either marketers are using Dr. Phil’s name in product branding (true affiliation unclear from these documents) or opportunistic vendors are leveraging celebrity imagery or claims in ways that prompt consumer confusion and complaints; Trustpilot pages reflect both satisfied customers and angry buyers, and one reviewer even contends the on-screen “wife” in an ad was an actress—an allegation that points to possible deceptive ad production but is not independently substantiated here ^{[4] [3] [1]}. The limited evidence set leaves open the possibility of misattribution, unauthorized use, or an unpublicized licensing deal; none of those possibilities are confirmed by the supplied sources ^{[4] [3] [1]}.

Conclusion: the provided reporting documents a strong marketplace association between “Dr. Phil” and Sugar Clean / Sugar Control products through branding and consumer perception, but it contains no direct, verifiable public statement or endorsement from Dr. Phil clarifying his relationship to those products; therefore, based solely on these sources, no such statement can be identified ^{[4] [3] [1] [2]}.