Is there verifiable evidence or footage of Donald Trump defecating his pants?

Checked on December 11, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

There is no authoritative, verified footage showing former President Donald Trump intentionally defecating his pants; available public clips include audio that some have described as “audibly sharting” during a televised debate and social/media items and investigations into diaper/poop rumors, while later AI-manipulated videos and partisan posts complicated the record (C-SPAN clips; MyNorthwest investigation; reporting on AI-generated material) [1] [2] [3] [4]. Major outlets and aggregated reporting show claims and memes circulating but do not provide independent verification that Trump defecated himself on camera [3] [5].

1. What exists on the public record: short video clips and audience reactions

Publicly posted clips include at least two C-SPAN user-clip entries from June 2024 that capture sounds described by uploaders as gastric distress or an “audible shart” during debate events; C-SPAN’s descriptions label one clip “Donald Trump Audibly Defecates Himself” and another “TRUMP CRAPS HIS PANTS,” noting audible noises when other mics were off [1] [2]. Separately, outlets republished or summarized videos of audience members reacting — for example, a Mirror US story about a French dinner where attendees appeared to notice an odor and claimed he “pooped himself” — but that reporting is built on reaction footage and social posts rather than a clear, verifiable on-camera act [5].

2. Investigations and local reporting — rumor chasing, not proof

Local pieces such as MyNorthwest’s segment explicitly framed the diaper/poop narrative as a rumor the hosts sought to “collect solid evidence” for, indicating their own acknowledgement that prior materials were inconclusive and largely rooted in gossip and online chatter rather than forensic proof [3]. That reporting shows how easily viral claims can drive follow-up coverage even when the underlying evidence is ambiguous.

3. The complicating factor: AI-manipulated and satirical content

By late 2025 the public record included clearly AI-generated or satirical videos depicting Trump dropping what appeared to be feces, which political figures and observers identified as synthetic or propagandistic — for example, a video President Trump shared was described by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and press accounts as AI-generated or manipulated content [4]. Other outlets described intentionally grotesque, agitprop-style posts that used feces imagery as political messaging; those are not documentary evidence of a real act but are confirmation that manipulated material has spread [6].

4. How to interpret audio-only or reaction clips

Audio anomalies on a live broadcast can be misinterpreted. The C-SPAN user clips capture a sound interpreted by some viewers as a “shart” or similar noise, but an audible noise alone does not prove full defecation; microphones, crowd noise, and editing choices can create misleading impressions [1] [2]. The sources documenting these clips are descriptions of user-submitted video on a network site and should not be conflated with forensic confirmation.

5. Competing viewpoints and partisan amplification

Sources show clear partisan dynamics: clips and rumors have been amplified by critics and supporters alike, and later, AI and satirical posts were deployed politically. Coverage ranges from local investigative curiosity (MyNorthwest) to widely shared mirror/viral pieces (The Mirror US) and political commentary about AI-driven feces videos (The Hill, Mother Jones) — presenting both the claim and rebuttal that some material is fabricated or synthetic [3] [5] [4] [6]. That mix means audience interpretation often reflects political priors more than independent verification.

6. What reporting does not establish

Available sources do not present authenticated forensic footage or medical evidence proving Trump defecated his pants on camera. There is no source in the provided set that documents chain-of-custody, third-party forensic analysis, or an official confirmation of full incontinence on any recorded occasion (not found in current reporting). Where footage exists, it is either ambiguous audio, reaction shots, or demonstrably altered AI content [1] [2] [4] [3] [5].

7. Bottom line and how to evaluate new claims

The public record contains ambiguous clips, rumor-driven local probes, and later AI-manipulated videos, but no verifiable, authenticated footage proving Donald Trump defecated his pants on camera according to the sources provided [1] [2] [3] [4]. Readers should treat single short clips and viral posts skeptically, check whether outlets have confirmed provenance or forensic analysis, and beware of AI or satirical content designed to inflame partisan reactions [4] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
Have reputable news outlets verified any footage showing Donald Trump with soiled clothing?
What are the reliable sources for confirming allegations about a public figure's bodily functions?
How have misinformation and doctored videos been used against politicians in recent elections?
What legal risks arise from sharing or publishing false intimate allegations about a public figure?
Have official statements from Trump or his representatives addressed claims about his health or personal incidents?