How have major news outlets and fact-checkers evaluated Candace Owens' claim regarding Erica Kearney and Egyptian military aircraft?

1. What the searchable record here actually contains — catalogues, not the specific claim

The documents returned in the search results are aggregate pages: a FactCheck.org person page that collects work on Candace Owens ^[1], PolitiFact listings of her fact-checks ^{[2] [3]}, and a Wikipedia biography that summarizes numerous controversies ^[4]. Those pages indicate major outlets and fact-checkers have repeatedly evaluated Owens’ public statements, but none of the provided pages include an article or ruling that specifically addresses “Erica Kearney” or “Egyptian military aircraft” — available sources do not mention that specific allegation ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}.

2. What FactCheck.org and PolitiFact do — context on method and scope

FactCheck.org and PolitiFact systematically review public claims and publish context, evidence, and rulings; the FactCheck.org Candace Owens archive compiles items where editors judged some of her statements misleading or false, such as misinterpretations of public-health documents ^[1]. PolitiFact’s listing demonstrates the organization’s ongoing monitoring and rating of Owens’ statements across many years and topics ^{[2] [3]}. This means these outlets are logical places to look for verification of a high-profile claim, though the specific claim you asked about does not appear on the provided indexes ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

3. What Wikipedia’s Candace Owens entry tells you — summary with caveats

Wikipedia’s Candace Owens article recounts a string of controversies and public statements and notes interactions with international authorities and legal matters ^[4]. The entry reflects mainstream reporting and is useful for background on Owens’ pattern of disputed claims, but it is a secondary aggregation that depends on news and fact-check sources; it does not substitute for a primary fact-check of a discrete allegation and does not mention the Erica Kearney/Egyptian aircraft claim in the results supplied ^[4].

4. Where to look next if you need a definitive answer

Because the supplied results don’t contain a fact-check or news story on this exact allegation, the appropriate next steps are to search FactCheck.org and PolitiFact directly for “Erica Kearney” and “Egyptian military aircraft,” search major news outlets’ databases, and review Owens’ original post or broadcast for sourcing. The archive pages and listings shown here ^{[1] [2] [3]} demonstrate that those organizations commonly address such claims, so if they have evaluated it, their platforms are the most likely place to find a clear ruling ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

5. How to interpret absence of indexed coverage

An absence of a record on these index pages does not prove the claim is true or false — it only shows the provided sources do not mention it. Fact-checkers sometimes prioritize widely circulated or verifiable claims; the presence of extensive coverage of Owens’ prior false or misleading statements ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]} means any similar high-profile allegation would likely draw their attention, but current provided reporting does not include that item ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}.

6. Bottom line and recommended verification steps

Bottom line: major fact-checkers and mainstream outlets have evaluated many of Candace Owens’ claims ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}, but the sources you supplied do not contain an evaluation of the specific claim about Erica Kearney and Egyptian military aircraft — available sources do not mention it ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}. To get a definitive assessment, check FactCheck.org’s article list and PolitiFact’s database for that exact claim, locate Owens’ original statement and any supporting evidence she offered, and consult primary reporting from major news organizations.