What fact-checking organizations monitor Fox News for misinformation?

1. Who routinely fact‑checks Fox News: the usual suspects

PolitiFact publishes a dedicated page of fact checks of Fox News content and runs lists filtering by speaker and rulings, demonstrating sustained coverage of Fox News statements over many years ^{[1] [7]}. FactCheck.org operates as an independent nonprofit fact‑checker that evaluates political claims and has content that addresses claims circulating in major media, a role that includes reviewing items tied to Fox News coverage ^[2]. Reuters Fact Check and AP Fact Check are news‑organization fact‑checking units that explicitly combat online misinformation and publish checks that can and do address claims from TV networks including Fox ^{[4] [3]}.

2. How these organizations approach Fox News material

PolitiFact’s archive shows they rate statements connected to Fox News on a Truth‑O‑Meter scale and allow filtering for “False” rulings tied to Fox programming, indicating a straightforward, claim‑by‑claim approach ^{[1] [8]}. FactCheck.org’s mission—“Because facts matter”—frames longer explainers that contextualize claims with primary documents and expert views; AP and Reuters likewise emphasize verification and impartiality, signaling newsroom standards rather than advocacy ^{[2] [3] [4]}.

3. Why multiple outlets check the same material — and what that reveals

The presence of several fact‑checking organizations working on the same network’s output reflects both Fox News’s large audience and political salience (Pew data: ~38% regularly get news from Fox in a 2025 survey) as well as the fact‑checkers’ remit to monitor influential public claims ^[6]. Different fact‑checkers may prioritize different types of claims (ranging from on‑air chyrons to hosts’ assertions), and their methods and rating systems vary; PolitiFact’s Truth‑O‑Meter, Reuters’ news‑style corrections, and AP’s fact‑check explainers are distinct products addressing overlapping problems ^{[1] [3] [4]}.

4. Competing perspectives and potential agendas to watch

Media‑analysis sites such as Media Bias/Fact Check rate Fox News’s news reporting as “generally fact‑based” but say opinion content skews propagandistic, which helps explain why fact‑checkers focus heavily on commentary as well as news segments ^[5]. Meanwhile, industry changes — for example, Meta’s 2025 decision to drop third‑party fact‑checking partnerships — can shift how misinformation is identified and who is funded to do the work, a structural dynamic that affects many fact‑checkers’ reach and resources ^[9]. Note: available sources do not mention every fact‑checking group that has ever checked Fox News (for example, Snopes or smaller non‑U.S. organizations) — their inclusion cannot be asserted from the provided reporting.

5. Practical takeaway for readers seeking verification

If you want to see fact checks of specific Fox News statements, start with PolitiFact’s Fox News page and its filters for false and recent rulings, then consult FactCheck.org, AP Fact Check and Reuters Fact Check for additional reporting and context; each brings different formats and emphases to the same verification task ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}. For judgments about the outlet as a whole, consult media‑analysis pieces such as Media Bias/Fact Check and audience research like Pew’s profiles to understand reach and differences between news and opinion programming ^{[5] [6]}.

Limitations and transparency: the above lists and descriptions reflect only the organizations and findings present in the supplied search results; available sources do not mention a comprehensive roster of every organization that has ever monitored Fox News, nor do they provide an exhaustive methodological comparison between every fact‑checker cited (not found in current reporting).