Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How does factually work
1. Summary of the results
Factually is an AI-powered health information platform that operates through two distinct conversation modes: Casual Chat and Augmented Chat [1]. The platform's primary function is to deliver credible, vetted health information to businesses and organizations, utilizing fact-checked datasets that extend beyond typical web search capabilities [1].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The question about how fact-checking works requires broader context about the effectiveness and limitations of fact-checking in general:
- Fact-checking has been shown to improve factual knowledge but has limited impact on changing core beliefs or voting intentions [2]
- People engage in "motivated reasoning" - accepting or rejecting evidence based on their pre-existing beliefs [2]
- Fact-checking serves multiple crucial functions beyond just correcting misinformation:
- Political accountability
- Media literacy promotion
- Misinformation challenge
- Verification technique development [2]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question oversimplifies what is actually a complex process. Important considerations include:
- Context-dependent effectiveness: Fact-checking's impact varies significantly depending on the situation, being particularly challenging during polarized events like elections [2]
- Rare "backfire" effects: While fact-checking can occasionally backfire, this mainly occurs with strong partisans and is not common [2]
- Platform-specific features: In Factually's case, the platform offers additional features like multilingual content and localized health resources that go beyond traditional fact-checking [1]
Those who benefit from promoting or dismissing fact-checking include:
- Media organizations (through increased credibility)
- Health information providers (through verified content distribution)
- Political entities (through either supporting or challenging fact-checking based on their agenda)
- Technology companies (through development and monetization of fact-checking platforms)