Fact check: Who is the person who founded the Factually Blog

1. Why the question matters and what the packet actually contains

The query asks for the founder of the “Factually Blog,” which presumes a distinct blog entity with an identifiable founder; verifying that requires sources that explicitly name such a person. The packet of analyses furnished here contains three categories of material: a 2012 profile that names Gilad Elbaz as founder of Factual, several Yahoo-related or unrelated policy and author pages that do not address the blog’s founder, and an interview that names Megan Kvamme as founder of FactGem. None of these documents expressly state, describe, or confirm the founding of an entity called “Factually Blog,” so the packet lacks direct evidence to answer the question ^{[1] [3] [2]}.

2. What the closest matches actually say and why they’re different

The strongest individual match in the packet is the 2012 New York Times profile stating Gilad Elbaz founded Factual, which is a data company focused on aggregating the “data universe.” That piece establishes Elbaz’s role with Factual, not a blog named “Factually,” and the name similarity may cause confusion. Another piece profiles Megan Kvamme as founder and CEO of FactGem, a distinct technology startup; again, the organization names differ and the article does not tie her to a “Factually Blog.” Several other items in the packet are Yahoo pages or unrelated blog posts that do not address founding claims, demonstrating gaps in relevance ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

3. Dates and recency: why timing matters for the claim

The materials span from 2012 to 2024, with the most consequential item being the 2012 NYT profile naming Gilad Elbaz ^[4], and a 2019 interview naming Megan Kvamme ^[5]. The Yahoo-related entries are dated in 2018–2024 but contain no founding information. No item in the packet is a recent authoritative source explicitly establishing the founder of a “Factually Blog,” and older sources that name founders of similarly named companies cannot be treated as proof that they founded an identically named blog. The absence of a direct, dated source means the claim cannot be resolved from the provided dataset ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

4. Contradictions, confusions, and likely causes of error

The packet suggests at least two plausible sources of confusion: name similarity between “Factual,” “FactGem,” and a hypothetical “Factually Blog,” and the presence of unrelated corporate or policy pages that include “fact” in their branding. It is common for readers to conflate similarly named entities, and the packet illustrates that tendency: one source misinterprets Factual as Factually, another introduces FactGem, and multiple Yahoo pages contribute no clarity. These mismatches create a high risk of misattribution when answering who founded a differently named site ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

5. What would conclusively answer the question and why it’s missing

A conclusive answer requires a primary source—an “About” page, a founding announcement, or a reliable news profile that explicitly states “Person X founded Factually Blog” with a verifiable date. The packet lacks any such primary or secondary source tied directly to an entity named “Factually Blog.” The available materials only reference other entities with distinct legal and brand identities, so they cannot serve as definitive evidence. Without a direct citation or archived page naming the founder, the claim remains unsupported by the provided documents ^{[1] [3] [2]}.

6. How different stakeholders might interpret the gap

Journalists and researchers will treat the packet’s gap as a research failure and will seek independent verification from domain registration records, archived “About” pages, or platform mastheads; those steps are necessary because the packet’s items point to other organizations. Brand owners and readers might press to conflate similar names for convenience or agenda, but such conflation would be unreliable. Fact-checkers must therefore refrain from asserting a founder without direct evidence; the materials here instead direct investigators to seek external, contemporary records naming the founder of any entity called “Factually Blog” ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

7. Bottom line and recommended next steps for verification

Bottom line: based on the supplied analyses, there is no documented founder of a “Factually Blog” in the packet. The two named founders reported—Gilad Elbaz and Megan Kvamme—lead other organizations (Factual and FactGem respectively) and do not establish a connection to a blog named “Factually.” To resolve the question, consult primary web records such as the blog’s masthead or “About” page, domain WHOIS and archive.org captures, or reputable news coverage that explicitly names the founder; until such sourcing is produced, the founder claim remains unverified ^{[1] [2] [3]}.