Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Is factually.co a right leaning, neutral, or left leaning website?

Checked on June 16, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, none of the sources contain specific information about factually.co's political bias or leaning. The search results primarily returned information about other fact-checking and media bias rating organizations, but failed to provide direct assessment of factually.co itself.

The only relevant finding comes from one source that suggests factually.co appears to be a fact-checking website that reports on various claims without taking a clear stance, suggesting a neutral or fact-based approach [1]. However, this assessment is limited and not based on a comprehensive bias analysis.

The sources instead discuss:

  • Ad Fontes Media and its mission to rate news sources for reliability and bias [2]
  • Media Bias/Fact Check and its methodology for rating news sources [3]
  • General discussions about media bias charts from AllSides and other organizations [4] [5]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The analyses reveal significant gaps in available information about factually.co's bias assessment:

  • No established media bias rating organizations like AllSides, Ad Fontes Media, or Media Bias/Fact Check appear to have formally evaluated factually.co [2] [3] [4] [5]
  • Limited sample size - only one source provided any characterization of the website's approach [1]
  • Lack of methodological analysis - there's no information about factually.co's funding sources, editorial policies, or systematic bias patterns that would typically inform such assessments

Alternative approaches to determining bias that weren't explored include:

  • Analysis of factually.co's funding sources and ownership structure
  • Systematic review of their fact-checking selections and conclusions
  • Comparison with established fact-checking organizations' assessments of the same claims

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself doesn't contain misinformation, but it assumes that factually.co has been sufficiently analyzed by reputable bias-rating organizations to warrant a definitive classification. The search results demonstrate this assumption is unfounded.

The question also implies that all websites can be neatly categorized into right-leaning, neutral, or left-leaning categories, when media bias assessment is often more nuanced and depends on multiple factors including:

  • Funding sources and ownership (as discussed in p3_s2 regarding methodology limitations)
  • Selection of stories and claims to fact-check
  • Framing and presentation of information
  • Consistency in applying fact-checking standards

The lack of comprehensive data about factually.co suggests either the website is relatively new, small-scale, or operates below the threshold that would attract attention from major media bias rating organizations.

Want to dive deeper?
What are the criteria for evaluating a website's political bias?
How does factually.co select and present its news stories?
Who are the primary funders and supporters of factually.co?
What do independent fact-checking organizations say about factually.co's bias?
How does factually.co compare to other news websites in terms of bias and neutrality?