Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: How factual is factually.co

Checked on June 13, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Factually.co appears to be a website with moderate legitimacy concerns, receiving a trust score of 66/100 from ScamAdviser [1]. While the site has some positive security indicators like a valid SSL certificate and is considered safe by DNSFilter, there are several concerning factors that warrant caution [1].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important technical aspects need to be considered when evaluating this website:

  • The website has implemented proper security measures with SSL certification [1]
  • The domain is relatively new, which could indicate either a legitimate new business or potential suspicious activity [1]
  • The website owner has chosen to hide their identity through WHOIS privacy protection, which is a common practice but can also be a red flag [1]
  • The site currently experiences low traffic volumes, which could suggest limited user trust or a new operation [1]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The question itself assumes a binary assessment of factuality, when website legitimacy exists on a spectrum. Several parties have vested interests in such assessments:

  • Security companies like ScamAdviser and DNSFilter benefit from providing these assessments and may err on the side of caution [1]
  • Website owners using the same registrar as factually.co have received poor reviews, which could indicate a pattern of questionable practices within that registration service [1]
  • Privacy advocates might argue that WHOIS privacy protection is a legitimate security measure, while others might see it as a red flag for transparency [1]

The most prudent approach, as suggested by ScamAdviser, is to conduct personal due diligence and verify information independently before engaging with the website [1].

Want to dive deeper?
What is the methodology behind factually.co's fact-checking process?
How does factually.co compare to other fact-checking websites like Snopes or PolitiFact?
What are the funding sources and ownership structure of factually.co?
How accurate are factually.co's fact-checks according to independent reviews?
What editorial standards and transparency measures does factually.co follow?