Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Is factually.co a legitimate fact checking service?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the available analyses, factually.co appears to be a relatively new website with limited credibility indicators. According to ScamAdviser, it received a trust score of 61/100, indicating medium risk [1]. While the website has some positive security features like a valid SSL certificate and is considered safe by DNSFilter, there are several concerning factors including hidden WHOIS information and a recently registered domain [1].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Important additional context that's missing from the original question:
- There are established fact-checking organizations like PolitiFact, Snopes, and FactCheck.org that have built credibility over time [2]
- Professional fact-checking networks like the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) and European Fact-Checking Standards Network (EFCSN) provide certifications that legitimate fact-checkers typically seek [3]
- The website has a low number of visitors and shares its registrar with other low-scored websites [1]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question assumes a binary answer (legitimate/not legitimate), which oversimplifies the complex nature of evaluating fact-checking services. Several factors should be considered:
- Financial/Influence Benefits: Unknown entities could benefit from operating an unaccredited fact-checking service to shape public opinion
- Transparency Issues: The website's owner is deliberately hiding their identity [1], which is unusual for legitimate fact-checking operations that typically pride themselves on transparency
- Verification Need: ScamAdviser specifically recommends that users should conduct their own due diligence rather than fully trusting the site [1]
The most prudent approach would be to rely on established fact-checking services that have proper accreditation through recognized networks like IFCN or EFCSN [3] rather than newly established services with limited track records.