Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Factually is politically biased

Checked on May 11, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The claim that fact-checking is politically biased requires nuanced examination. Research from both Harvard and Stanford confirms that political bias is a fundamental aspect of how all humans process information, with people across political spectrums and education levels tending to prioritize political alignment over factual accuracy [1] [2]. However, specific fact-checking organizations like Factcheck.org maintain high standards of non-partisan reporting and are rated as "LEAST BIASED" with "VERY HIGH" factual reporting ratings [3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual elements are worth considering:

  • Balanced reporting principles: True journalistic balance doesn't mean giving equal weight to all perspectives, particularly when scientific consensus exists [4]
  • Definition of media bias: Proper journalism should present multiple viewpoints and allow viewers to make informed decisions, rather than presenting only one perspective [5]
  • Human cognitive bias: Research shows that people from all political backgrounds tend to interpret the same information differently to reinforce their existing beliefs [1]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement oversimplifies a complex issue and potentially misleads by:

  • Ignoring institutional safeguards: Organizations like Factcheck.org actively monitor both Republican and Democratic claims to maintain neutrality [3]
  • Conflating personal bias with institutional bias: While individuals naturally exhibit political bias in information processing [2], professional fact-checking organizations have established methodologies to counteract this
  • Who benefits: Those who wish to discredit fact-checkers often benefit from undermining trust in neutral arbiters of truth. This includes:
  • Political actors whose claims are fact-checked
  • Media organizations that prefer partisan reporting
  • Groups whose narratives are challenged by fact-based reporting
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?