Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Is factually bias? Who runs factually?

Checked on June 13, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The question appears to confuse two different fact-checking organizations - Factually (which isn't mentioned in the sources) and FactCheck.org. FactCheck.org is a nonprofit organization founded by Brooks Jackson and is associated with the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania [1]. It employs four full-time journalists and receives primary funding from the Annenberg Foundation [1].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual elements need to be considered:

  • Media Bias Fact Check (MBFC) is a separate organization that evaluates media bias, with over 9,500 sources in their database [2]
  • MBFC has actually rated FactCheck.org as "Least Biased" with "Very High" factual reporting [3]
  • The broader context of media independence is crucial - accusations of bias are sometimes used by authoritarians as a tool to discredit legitimate investigative journalism [4]
  • Transparency in funding and editorial processes is considered essential for building trust in news organizations [5]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains several problematic assumptions:

  • It conflates different fact-checking organizations, potentially leading to confusion
  • The term "factually bias" is grammatically incorrect and unclear
  • The question oversimplifies the complex nature of media bias and fact-checking

To provide proper context: FactCheck.org positions itself as a nonpartisan "consumer advocate" for voters [3]. They have received multiple awards and are considered highly reliable for accurate, low-bias fact-checking [3]. The organization's funding and institutional affiliation are transparent - they are funded by the Annenberg Foundation and affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania [1], which helps establish their credibility and independence.

Want to dive deeper?
What is the editorial stance and political leaning of Factually.news?
Who are the founders and investors behind Factually.news platform?
How does Factually.news compare to other fact-checking websites in terms of accuracy?
What methodology does Factually.news use to verify information and sources?
Has Factually.news been criticized for bias by media watchdog organizations?