Fact check: What is the editorial stance and political leaning of Factually.news?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the provided analyses, there is insufficient information to determine the editorial stance and political leaning of Factually.news. Neither of the provided sources contains any direct information about Factually.news's editorial position or political orientation ^{[1] [2]}.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

While the sources don't provide information about Factually.news specifically, they do reference:

• Ad Fontes Media's media bias chart methodology, which is a systematic approach to evaluating media bias ^[1]
• The existence of rating systems that evaluate media outlets on both their political orientation and factual reporting quality, as demonstrated in the case of Anonymous News ^[2]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The question itself assumes that:

• Factually.news has a clear, definable editorial stance
• Its political leaning can be accurately determined

However, it's important to note that:

• Media bias evaluation requires systematic analysis using established methodologies, such as those employed by Ad Fontes Media ^[1]
• Political orientation and factual reporting quality are separate metrics that should be evaluated independently, as shown in the rating system mentioned ^[2]
• Without proper sourcing and analysis, any claims about a news outlet's political leaning could be misleading or incomplete

*Note: To accurately assess Factually.news's editorial stance and political leaning, additional sources specifically analyzing this outlet would be necessary.*