The medals of FIFA who give trump was real or fake
Executive summary
FIFA publicly awarded President Donald Trump the inaugural “FIFA Peace Prize” at the 2026 World Cup draw on Dec. 5, 2025; he was handed a trophy, a medal which he wore, and a certificate onstage by FIFA president Gianni Infantino [1] [2]. Multiple international outlets — Reuters, BBC, AP, The Guardian, Fortune and others — report the ceremony and the physical medal as real, while critics called the award politically driven and an “ego-stroking stunt” [1] [3] [4] [5].
1. What happened onstage — the basic facts
Gianni Infantino presented Trump with a newly created FIFA Peace Prize at the World Cup draw in Washington; the presentation included a gold-plated trophy (a globe held by hands), a medal that Trump placed around his neck, and a certificate recognizing his “actions to promote peace and unity” [1] [5] [6]. News agencies photographed and videoed the moment and described Trump wearing the medal immediately after receiving it [1] [4].
2. Was the medal “real” or “fake”? How outlets described it
Major news organizations described the medal and trophy as tangible objects given onstage. Reuters, AP, BBC, Fortune, The Guardian and local U.S. outlets all reported that a physical medal was presented and that Trump donned it [1] [6] [3] [5] [4]. Reporting treats the medal as a real ceremonial object created by FIFA for this purpose; no credible source in the set calls the item a prop or counterfeit [1] [6].
3. Why some commentators called it “fake,” and what that claim means
Critics and commentators used “fake” rhetorically to signal the prize’s dubious provenance and political motive, not to dispute that a medal physically existed. Fan groups and media commentators labelled the award an “ego-stroking stunt” and mocked the spectacle, framing it as FIFA creating a bespoke honor to flatter a political ally [2] [4] [7]. Those reactions point to legitimacy concerns — not to forensic claims the medal was a sham object [4] [7].
4. How FIFA described the prize and the transparency gap
FIFA presented the prize as a new annual award “to reward individuals who have taken exceptional and extraordinary actions for peace,” but reporters noted FIFA did not disclose nominees or explain the selection process for the inaugural award [1] [2]. Investigations and critics highlighted that a new committee will propose future processes — raising questions about how decisions were made for this first presentation [8] [2].
5. Political context and conflicts of interest raised by reporting
Several outlets emphasize the close relationship between Infantino and Trump, and that the award comes after Infantino’s repeated public praise of Trump’s diplomacy; critics argue the prize risks mixing sport governance with partisan political theater [9] [5] [10]. Football supporters’ groups and commentators framed the move as damaging FIFA’s neutrality; outlets reported widespread mockery of the stunt [2] [4] [7].
6. Competing viewpoints in the coverage
FIFA and Infantino framed the medal as legitimate recognition of peace-building; Infantino publicly lauded Trump’s role in brokering ceasefires and other diplomatic steps [1] [5]. Journalists and fan groups countered that FIFA failed to publish a credible process and that the award primarily served a personal or political agenda — a dispute reflected consistently across Reuters, The Guardian, BBC and Fortune [1] [4] [3] [5].
7. What sources do not address
Available sources do not mention any forensic claim that the medal was counterfeit or physically fake; they also do not provide internal FIFA documents detailing how the inaugural recipient was chosen [2] [8]. There is no reporting in these items that the medal was a prop or that it lacked provenance as an object [1] [6].
8. Bottom line for readers
A real, physical medal was presented and worn onstage and widely documented by international press [1] [6]. The sharper dispute is over legitimacy and motive: critics say FIFA created and awarded the prize in a way that favors a political ally and lacks disclosed selection procedures; FIFA presented it as a bona fide new honour for peace [2] [4] [5]. Decide whether your concern is factual (was there a medal? — yes) or normative (was the award appropriate or impartial? — contested in the reporting) [1] [4].