Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

How does Fox News bias compare to CNN or MSNBC?

Checked on November 13, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive Summary

Fox News is consistently identified as the most right‑leaning of the three cable outlets, while CNN and MSNBC are generally identified as left‑of‑center to centrist, with substantial variation by time slot and show. Multiple measurement methods—blind surveys, content analysis, and screen‑time ideology scoring—converge on the finding that primetime programming drives the largest partisan gaps, with Fox skewing conservative and CNN/MSNBC skewing liberal [1] [2] [3].

1. What advocates and studies actually claim about “who’s biased more” — short, blunt extraction

Analysts and watchdogs repeatedly claim that Fox News shows a strong conservative bias, with a higher incidence of false or misleading statements and internal employee concern about editorial alignment; CNN and MSNBC are described as left‑leaning or critical of conservative figures [4]. Blind public surveys place Fox on the right and CNN/MSNBC on the left, but the magnitude varies by survey and date: AllSides’ Nov 2023 survey rated Fox “Lean Right,” CNN “Lean Left,” and MSNBC “Lean Left,” while an earlier AllSides survey placed Fox farther right in June 2023 [1] [5]. Academic content analyses of specific evenings find both CNN and Fox partisan in opposite directions, with guest selection and framing reinforcing those slants [6].

2. Measurement methods diverge — why different studies reach different answers

Different studies use different metrics: blind audience perception surveys (AllSides) capture perceived tilt among viewers, transcript content analyses measure language and guest balance, and screen‑time ideology scoring assigns ideological weights to on‑screen actors across years [1] [6] [2]. These methods produce consistent directional findings—Fox to the right, CNN/MSNBC to the left—but yield different magnitudes because perception, momentary content, and long‑run exposure are distinct phenomena. The PNAS/Stanford longitudinal approach shows bias is dynamic and hour‑by‑hour, explaining why short sample transcript studies and public surveys can appear to disagree even when they point to the same overall pattern [3] [2].

3. Primetime is where the partisan heat is turned up

Multiple analyses identify primetime programming as the primary driver of network divergence. The longitudinal machine‑learning work and the University of Utah/PNAS studies both show afternoon blocks converge toward neutral framing while primetime hosts and shows diverge sharply—Fox becomes markedly conservative in the evening while CNN and MSNBC move leftward [3] [2]. Content analysis of individual evenings documents that Fox’s guests skew Republican and praise conservative leaders, whereas CNN’s guests are more mixed and its commentary more critical of conservative figures; MSNBC is noted more broadly for left‑leaning primetime content in other studies [6] [7]. This pattern indicates time of day matters more than channel label for the viewer’s exposure to slant.

4. Electoral influence and claims about impact — the stakes of slant

Some economic and empirical work argues Fox’s slant is not only conservative but influential—positioned beyond the ratings‑maximizing center and potentially affecting vote shares—while CNN is characterized as closer to a centrist, ratings‑maximizing position with high potential “media power,” and MSNBC as left‑leaning with weaker measured electoral effect [7]. These findings suggest the bias debate is not purely academic: network slant can have measurable downstream effects on public opinion and possibly election outcomes. However, studies differ on magnitude and causality, and methods vary between correlational assessments of screen time, experimental perception studies, and econometric estimates of vote shifts [7] [8].

5. Why audiences and watchdogs see differences — incentives and editorial choices

Watchdog reports and internal accounts point to editorial incentives: Fox’s programming choices, guest selection, and alleged tolerance for misleading statements align with a conservative political orientation, while CNN and MSNBC emphasize critical treatment of conservative actors and themes resonant with left‑leaning audiences [4] [6]. AllSides’ blind survey illuminates perceived bias among cross‑partisan audiences, but shifts over time show networks can drift and respond to market and political incentives. The presence of partisan hosts, explicit opinion shows, and distinct primetime lineups creates predictable slant patterns that mirror broader audience segmentation and commercial incentives [1] [2].

6. Practical takeaway for news consumers — how to read these channels now

The evidence across methodologies is clear that Fox News is the most consistently right‑leaning, particularly in primetime, while CNN and MSNBC are generally left‑leaning or centrist depending on the measure and time period [3] [1] [2]. Consumers should treat primetime opinion shows as ideological content rather than neutral news, seek multiple time‑slot samples if assessing balance, and consult independent fact‑checks for contentious claims. Recognize that measurement tools—surveys, content analysis, and screen‑time ideology scoring—each illuminate a different facet of bias; combining them gives the most complete picture of how Fox, CNN, and MSNBC differ in practice [6] [8].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the top organizations rating media bias like AllSides or Ad Fontes?
How do viewer demographics differ between Fox News CNN and MSNBC audiences?
Has the bias of Fox News shifted under different leadership?
What impact does perceived media bias have on election coverage?
Are there bipartisan efforts to address bias in cable news?