Video on elan musk with Laura Ingram from Fox News on dementia

Checked on January 13, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

A widely circulated video purporting to show Elon Musk and Fox News host Laura Ingraham revealing a suppressed “brain health” or dementia cure appears to be a fabricated marketing asset used to promote a scam product, while Elon Musk has independently made public remarks expressing he would not want to live to 100 with dementia [1] [2].

1. What the viral video claims and where it was found

The clip that many users encounter is styled to look like a Fox News segment and claims to show Elon Musk and Laura Ingraham discussing a supposed medical breakthrough or “brain health” secret tied to preventing dementia; scam-analysis reporting traces that video to commercial landing pages, such as lungheal-hub.com, which present the footage as a Fox-style exclusive to sell a supplement called Sweet Restore/Vismax Revive [1].

2. Evidence the clip is falsified and used in a scam funnel

Investigations into the promotion reveal that the long-form “Fox-like” video is assembled as a marketing tool rather than a legitimate news segment and is explicitly described as falsely depicting Musk and Ingraham discussing a medical breakthrough; independent scam watchdog reporting warns the video is part of an ad funnel that has no credible evidence supporting the dementia-treatment claims and that the product being marketed is actually a vision supplement, not a dementia therapy [1].

3. What Elon Musk has actually said about dementia and longevity

On the substance of Musk’s views about aging and cognitive decline, Musk publicly told a podcast audience he would prefer to be dead rather than living to 100 with dementia or being a burden, remarks reported in contemporary coverage of his interview with Peter Diamandis; those comments reflect Musk’s personal stance on quality of life and longevity but do not constitute scientific claims of a cure [2].

4. Fox News’ involvement is ambiguous and matters for credibility

There is no authenticated Fox News segment matching the fraudulent “exclusive” used in the scam funnel; while Fox News hosts and segments have discussed Musk on unrelated topics (as shown by other Fox pieces), the specific video used in the scam is a fabricated imitation rather than a documented Fox broadcast, and credible reporting flags the clip as falsely depicting Fox-style coverage [3] [1].

5. Motives and mechanics: why these fake videos spread

The scam operators benefit from arranging authoritative aesthetics—faux newsroom graphics, well-known personalities, and urgent medical language—to manufacture credibility and drive clicks and purchases; reporting on the funnel highlights that search interest spikes because consumers encounter ads presented as urgent, medically groundbreaking revelations, an effective playbook for monetizing fear about dementia [1].

6. Alternate viewpoints and limits of the available reporting

While the scam-reporting sources identify the video as falsely depicting Musk and Ingraham and assert the marketed product lacks credible evidence, the available material does not include a takedown statement from Musk, Ingraham, or Fox News quoted directly in those reports, so the public record in these sources documents the deception and the real Musk podcast comments but does not show responses from the named individuals or legal actions tied to the clip [1] [2].

7. Practical guidance drawn from the reporting

The coverage suggests treating unexpected “exclusive” medical videos with skepticism: verify the clip against the host outlet’s official site or archives, look for independent reporting, and be wary of landing pages selling cures that frame news anchors and celebrities as endorsers, since the concrete example here was identified as a false depiction exploited to sell an unrelated supplement [1].

Want to dive deeper?
How can consumers verify whether a news clip featuring a celebrity is authentic or part of a scam funnel?
What legal or platform actions have been taken against websites using fabricated news-style videos to sell health products?
What did Elon Musk say in full during the Peter Diamandis podcast about longevity and dementia, and how have commentators interpreted those remarks?