Fact check: Did Gavin Mcinnes try proving that he can dance better than Hilary Clinton even with a butt plug in.

1. What the claim actually says and why it matters — separating allegation from narrative

The allegation combines a personal challenge (McInnes attempting to prove superior dancing), a named target (Hillary Clinton), and a salacious detail (a butt plug). The core factual elements to verify are whether Gavin McInnes made such a claim or staged such an event, whether Hillary Clinton was the comparator in any public contest, and whether the sexualized element was present and documented. Verifying those elements requires primary reporting or audio/video evidence; the provided analyses show summaries and articles on McInnes’s shows and public controversies but do not document this specific stunt or quote ^{[1] [4]}. The absence of documentation in the available material is itself a meaningful finding: it indicates the claim is uncorroborated by these sources.

2. What the supplied evidence about Gavin McInnes actually contains — focus on documented topics

The materials about Gavin McInnes cover his media productions, his links to Vice’s early days, and later controversies including the Proud Boys and use of provocative humor. Multiple summaries and analyses explicitly state that none of the referenced texts mention him attempting to outdance Hillary Clinton or referencing a butt plug. The supplied sources include show episode lists, profiles of McInnes’s evolution, and critiques of his dark humor, but they consistently lack any reference to the reported stunt or quote ^{[1] [5] [2]}. That consistent absence across varied analyses reduces the plausibility of the specific claim, given these items cover his public output and notable controversies.

3. What the supplied evidence about Hillary Clinton actually documents — dancing videos but not competitions

The material about Hillary Clinton documents viral or archival clips of her dancing — for example performing the “La Macarena” at a party — and commentary on how such footage resurfaced in political contexts. These sources show Hillary Clinton’s dancing has been widely circulated and discussed, but they do not include any competitive confrontation or public challenge with Gavin McInnes. The supplied Clinton-focused analyses emphasize viral reception and political framing of dancing footage rather than any link to McInnes or eroticized props ^{[3] [6]}. Thus the two subjects’ public materials, as provided, address separate narratives without overlap.

4. How experts and media describe McInnes’s methods — provocative stunts versus documented events

Analyses of McInnes’s career repeatedly characterize his approach as using dark humor, shock tactics, and controversial rhetoric, which can produce fabricated or exaggerated claims in partisan environments. The supplied documentary-oriented analyses and profiles discuss his use of provocative content and involvement in contentious groups, but again they do not document the specific sexualized dance claim ^{[7] [5]}. The presence of sensationalism in his public persona makes such a claim plausible as rumor content, but plausibility is not evidence; the materials provided demonstrate patterns of provocation without confirming this particular alleged act.

5. Why the claim is likely false or unproven and where the allegation might have originated

Given the consistent absence of the alleged event in the supplied materials about McInnes and Clinton, the most supportable conclusion is that the claim is unproven and likely a fabricated or misattributed rumor. The sources offered cover McInnes’s public output, historical profiles, and Clinton’s dancing footage; none contain the described stunt or quoted intent. The allegation could have originated as a deliberate provocation, a satirical piece misread as factual, or as partisan misinformation designed to elicit shock. The supplied analyses suggest both figures attract sensational claims, making the spread of an unverified anecdote credible in circulation even without evidence ^{[1] [4] [3]}.

6. Bottom line and recommended next steps for verification

The provided source set does not corroborate the statement that Gavin McInnes tried to prove he could dance better than Hillary Clinton “even with a butt plug in”; therefore the claim should be treated as unsubstantiated. For further verification, seek primary audiovisual footage, contemporaneous posts from McInnes’s official channels, or reputable mainstream reporting that explicitly documents the alleged event. Until such direct evidence is produced, the responsible conclusion based on the available materials is that the claim is unsupported by the documented record ^{[1] [2] [3]}.