Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What examples of biased reporting or controversies have been documented about GB News?
Executive summary
GB News has been repeatedly documented as controversial for partisan, opinion-led coverage, multiple Ofcom impartiality investigations, and accusations of spreading anti‑climate and anti‑migrant frames; Reuters/Reuters-linked data and Wikipedia note numerous Ofcom run‑ins and a low trust rating, while specialist monitors and campaign groups document examples of inflammatory or misleading content [1] [2] [3]. Reporting about GB News is sharply divided: some outlets and watchdogs describe systematic bias and rule‑breaking, while supporters and some commentators argue it provides a needed right‑leaning corrective to mainstream news — both views appear across the material [4] [5].
1. The regulatory record: Ofcom investigations and legal reversals
GB News has faced numerous Ofcom investigations for impartiality breaches — these are central to mainstream critiques of the channel — and Wikipedia summarises a history of “breaches of impartiality rules and run‑ins with the broadcasting regulator Ofcom” that led to multiple investigations [1]. That source also records that as of March 2025 a High Court decision overturned remaining Ofcom findings, with Ofcom dropping investigations after the court ruled in GB News’s favour [1]. This produces a split record: regulatory probes documented by media watchdogs, but at least some enforcement findings were subsequently overturned in court [1].
2. Patterns critics highlight: bias, polarising framing, and content studies
Multiple investigative groups and campaigners have catalogued patterns they say demonstrate bias. DeSmog’s content analysis counted at least 953 “anti‑climate attacks” around the 2024 election, claiming frequent on‑air scepticism of climate science and policies on GB News [2]. Left‑leaning monitoring (e.g., Muslim Council’s CfMM cited in Left Foot Forward) alleges GB News disproportionately associated Muslims with violence in specific coverage, finding GB News accounted for 62% of clips linking Muslims to far‑right riots in one review [6]. Civil society groups like Good Law Project have campaigned over repeated alleged rule breaches and advertiser pressure [7]. These sources present quantitative and qualitative critiques showing recurring editorial choices that critics call agenda‑driven [2] [6] [7].
3. Defenders and alternative readings: “transparent bias” or corrective journalism
Some commentators and publications defend GB News as offering a clear right‑leaning alternative or corrective to perceived mainstream bias. TheArticle argues GB News is “often biased” but transparently so and suggests it fills a demand for different perspectives in a media landscape critics say favours other political lines [4]. Aggregate media‑rating services (Ground News, AllSides) assign GB News a right‑leaning bias or “Lean Right” label and a mixed factuality rating, placing it in a defined ideological slot rather than treating it as purely disinformation [8] [9]. These perspectives frame GB News as partisan but not uniquely illegitimate — a rival pole in a polarized media market [4] [9].
4. Campaigns, boycotts and advertiser pressure as part of the controversy
Documented controversies have produced public campaigns and advertiser scrutiny. Boycott GB News explicitly frames the channel as an attempt to import a Fox‑style model to the UK and urges advertiser withdrawal, while Good Law Project and other activists have mobilised complaints to Ofcom and targeted advertisers over slurs and inflammatory remarks [10] [7]. These organised responses both signal public concern and can feed GB News’s branding as a persecuted outsider, which supporters exploit in recruitment and fundraising narratives [10] [7].
5. Trust, audiences and market position — a mixed picture
Survey and audience data cited across sources show GB News has low trust among mainstream broadcasters yet a growing and engaged viewership. The Reuters Institute survey and secondary analyses report GB News as the least trusted among main UK broadcasters (negative net trust) but with measurable weekly reach (around 9% in one survey) and rising viewing figures in some time slots; Wikipedia summarises these competing metrics and notes both low trust and rising audience figures [1] [11]. The combination of low institutional trust and loyal audience explains why controversies reverberate despite partial regulatory pushback [1] [11].
6. How to interpret the mix of evidence — caveats and open questions
Available sources document clear instances where watchdogs, academics and NGOs flag biased framing, breaches and problematic content [2] [6] [7], while other pieces and ratings agencies characterise GB News as a partisan but mainstream‑operating broadcaster [4] [9]. Crucially, the official regulatory story is not unambiguous: Ofcom investigations existed, but at least some findings were later overturned by a court [1]. Sources do not provide a single, definitive catalogue of every disputed segment or a comprehensive list of all rulings; available sources do not mention an exhaustive timeline in one place.
Conclusion — what readers should take away: GB News is widely documented as opinion‑led and has repeatedly generated controversies over impartiality, climate coverage and framing of minorities; at the same time it has defenders who say it transparently offers a right‑of‑centre corrective and some regulatory findings were overturned. Assessments depend on whether one emphasises documented content patterns and watchdog findings, or legal outcomes and self‑presentation as an alternative voice [2] [6] [1] [4].