Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Who are the major owners and investors in GB News and how do their political connections shape coverage?
Executive summary
GB News is owned through holding company All Perspectives Ltd with principal backers including hedge‑fund billionaire Sir Paul Marshall and Dubai‑based Legatum (often called Legatum Group/Legatum Ltd); owners have repeatedly injected tens of millions to cover heavy losses and keep the channel running (owners pumped £34m; earlier injections include £41m and other sums) [1] [2] [3]. Reporting and watchdog activity have flagged partisan programming and Ofcom investigations (some later overturned in court), and analysts tie the owners’ political donations, think‑tank links and media purchases to a right‑leaning editorial orientation — but sources also show the company arguing it fills a market gap and defends free‑speech priorities [4] [5] [6].
1. Who the major owners and investors are — the headline names
Public filings and contemporaneous reporting identify All Perspectives Ltd as GB News’s holding company and list Sir Paul Marshall and the Legatum investment group as the primary financial backers; other early investors and minority shareholders have included individual presenters and founders with small stakes, while some institutional or international investors (for example, previously Warner Bros Discovery) have at times held and then exited minority positions [4] [3] [6] [7].
2. How much money owners have put in — scale and frequency of funding
Owners have repeatedly recapitalised the broadcaster. The Financial Times and company reports note significant injections — for example owners pumped a further £34m in early 2025 and prior funding rounds and emergency injections were reported in 2024 and 2025, with filings showing repeated reliance on All Perspectives to plug losses [1] [2] [8]. Independent reporting documents cumulative losses and continuing dependence on investor funding [1] [8].
3. The political networks around the owners — think‑tanks, donations and linked outlets
Sir Paul Marshall is an established media investor (Spectator, UnHerd) with a record of political donations and involvement in conservative‑leaning initiatives; Legatum’s founder Christopher Chandler and Legatum‑linked foundations have donated to or run policy projects that engage with Conservative politics, and reporting links these investor entities to organisations such as the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship and other right‑of‑centre networks [9] [10] [11]. DeSmog and Tribune reporting note direct donations by Legatum vehicles to Conservative factions and draw lines between investor activities and policy advocacy [10] [3].
4. Editorial effects noted in coverage and oversight actions
GB News has been widely described as right‑leaning in press analysis and media‑bias reviews; Ofcom opened multiple impartiality investigations and at least one substantial fine was imposed, though some regulatory findings were later challenged and overturned in court, a point emphasised in reporting [4] [12] [1]. Press coverage highlights programming choices — use of political presenters, strong opinion‑led shows and hires of high‑profile right‑of‑centre figures — as evidence that editorial tone syncs with investor orientation [4] [6] [3].
5. Alternative perspectives and the company’s defence
GB News and its investor statements present the channel as filling a perceived gap in UK broadcasting: serving “voices” outside metropolitan elites, promoting debate, and defending free‑speech approaches. The broadcaster and investor pages explicitly frame investments as supporting regional voice and pluralism [5] [3]. Financial supporters argue investment is commercial/personal rather than state or party control [3].
6. Where the evidence is strongest — and where it is thin
Evidence is strong that Sir Paul Marshall and Legatum are major funders and that investors have committed repeated capital injections; it is also well documented that GB News’s output is opinion‑heavy and that Ofcom has investigated impartiality [1] [2] [4]. Less concrete in the supplied material is direct, documented editorial interference — available sources describe political links, shared personnel and overlapping agendas but do not provide a public, cited instance in these results where an owner explicitly ordered a specific editorial line; available sources do not mention such an explicit instruction [9] [10].
7. What to watch next — transparency, funding and regulatory outcomes
Future reporting and filings to Companies House, FT/Reuters coverage of investor injections, and any new Ofcom rulings or court challenges will sharpen the picture [7] [1]. Watch for (a) shareholder disclosures in All Perspectives Ltd filings, (b) any new donor‑oriented revelations (for example about Legatum or related foundations), and (c) changes in revenue model (subscriptions/advertiser boycotts) that could shift investor leverage over content [4] [8].
Limitations: this assessment uses the supplied sources only; they document owners, funding rounds, investor political activity and regulator action but do not contain a full internal record of editorial decision‑making or a legal finding that owners directly dictated programming choices [1] [10].