What did The Guardian and Jezebel report about Norm Lubow's role in the Katie Johnson filings?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The Guardian and Jezebel both reported that a shadowy publicist using the name “Al Taylor” played a central role in promoting the anonymous “Katie Johnson” lawsuits and that investigative reporting tied that persona to former Jerry Springer producer Norm Lubow, whom the outlets say helped organize and shop the claims to media and operatives [1] [2]. Jezebel emphasized the abrasive, mercenary behavior of the Taylor figure during its reporting, while The Guardian presented documentary and circumstantial evidence linking Taylor to Lubow and noted Lubow’s denials at the time; later reporting by fact-checkers records Lubow’s 2024 admission to being Taylor and assisting the early filings [2] [1] [3].
1. How The Guardian framed the connection between “Al Taylor” and Norm Lubow
The Guardian’s reporting focused on the investigative trail that tied the publicist known as “Al Taylor” to Norm Lubow, saying multiple lines of evidence linked the Taylor persona to a former Jerry Springer producer and concluding that the lawsuits “appeared to be organized” by Lubow, while also documenting that Lubow had a history of disputed celebrity claims that raised credibility questions [1] [4]. The Guardian described how access to the purported accuser was tightly controlled through the Taylor figure and that the initial, unrepresented filing prompted interest from lawyers and political operatives only after Taylor began shopping the story to reporters [1] [5]. The paper also recorded Lubow’s denials at the time that he was Taylor even as it published its investigation linking the identities [1].
2. Jezebel’s account: a pushy middleman, a demand for money, and threats
Jezebel’s pieces highlighted the on-the-ground chaotic promotion of the Johnson claims, portraying the key intermediary as a combative, mercenary presence who both demanded a reported $1 million for a disguised video of the accuser and at times threatened journalists, including an episode in which the Taylor number sent abusive texts to a reporter after being pressed for answers [2]. Jezebel reiterated The Guardian’s finding that the Taylor persona matched Norm Lubow and emphasized that Jezebel’s direct attempts to reach Johnson and to verify Taylor’s identity were frustrated by Taylor’s hostile behavior and refusal to make the accuser available [2] [6]. Jezebel also reported that the Taylor figure claimed past TV production credentials that were difficult to verify, further complicating reporters’ ability to assess the origin story [2].
3. Credibility caveats the outlets reported and competing perspectives
Both outlets did not simply assert fabrication; The Guardian and Jezebel noted that legal representatives and some lawyers involved continued to vouch for the existence of an accuser and that issues with Taylor’s credibility should not automatically invalidate the underlying allegation—points The Guardian reported from an attorney who said credibility concerns about Al Taylor should not cast doubt on Johnson’s allegations [1]. Jezebel likewise quoted attorneys and other backers who maintained belief in the plaintiff even as Jezebel documented the troubling promotional tactics and opaque control of access [6]. The coverage thus balanced reporting on the provenance and promotion of the lawsuits with acknowledgement that questions about a promoter do not, by themselves, prove or disprove the substantive allegation [1] [6].
4. What happened afterward: later fact-checking and Lubow’s later admission
Although both The Guardian and Jezebel reported Lubow’s denials in 2016, later fact-checking reached a different conclusion: Snopes reported that when interviewed in July 2024 Lubow confirmed he was the person behind the Al Taylor persona and said he had aided the accuser in the first lawsuit and in promoting the claims to journalists, a development that postdates the original Guardian and Jezebel reports [3] [5]. The outlets’ original thrust—that the Johnson story was being actively shaped and sold by a shadowy intermediary tied to Lubow—was thus underscored by later admissions, even as legal outcomes and unanswered evidentiary questions about the allegations themselves remained unresolved [3] [5].