Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How did The Guardian collaborate with Edward Snowden and other outlets to report on NSA surveillance in 2013?
Executive summary
The Guardian was the principal British newsroom that received and first published major caches of classified NSA documents supplied by Edward Snowden in June 2013, working closely with Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras and other outlets to verify, redact and sequence revelations that exposed programs such as Verizon metadata collection, PRISM and tools like Boundless Informant and XKeyscore [1] [2] [3]. The paper dispatched reporters to meet Snowden in Hong Kong, coordinated publication with partners including the New York Times and the Washington Post, and later faced intense government pressure — including the destruction of hard drives in its London office at officials’ request — while sharing reporting resources and credit with colleagues abroad [4] [5] [6].
1. How Snowden contacted journalists and why The Guardian became central
Snowden made initial approaches to journalists before going public; after an early anonymous contact with Glenn Greenwald failed to produce secure communications, Snowden contacted filmmaker Laura Poitras and then linked with Greenwald and The Guardian, which resulted in Greenwald, Poitras and The Guardian’s Ewen MacAskill travelling to Hong Kong to meet Snowden and receive the documents [7] [4] [8]. The Guardian’s investigative capacity and willingness to publish classified material made it a focal point for the first public disclosures — for example, the first story showing an NSA court order to Verizon was published by The Guardian [1] [9].
2. On-the-ground logistics: meetings, secure handoffs and publication timing
Reporting accounts show Greenwald and Poitras set up encrypted communications with Snowden; once in Hong Kong, Snowden handed over material (initially on a USB stick) and consented to interviews filmed by Poitras and conducted by Greenwald, which culminated in coordinated publication beginning in early June 2013 [8] [10]. The Guardian says it published the first Snowden documents showing mass collection of telephone records and then followed with a steady stream of revelations about PRISM, Boundless Informant and other programs [1] [2].
3. Collaboration with other outlets and international coordination
Although The Guardian led early publication, it worked with other major news organisations: journalists in the U.S. such as Barton Gellman (Washington Post) and others were given selected documents to report simultaneous or subsequent stories, and The Guardian later described collaboration with The New York Times and the Washington Post in parsing the files and expanding coverage [7] [5]. The Guardian’s editors also informed government officials that other copies of the files existed outside Britain — implicitly acknowledging a distributed reporting model that included partners overseas [6].
4. Editorial decisions, redaction and national-security pushback
The Guardian says it made editorial judgements about what to publish and redact in the public interest; those decisions provoked intense state reaction. UK officials visited The Guardian and demanded surrender of the files, and under pressure the paper destroyed hard drives containing Snowden material kept in its London office while reporting and publication continued from other locations [6] [3]. The paper and its reporters later won awards for public service reporting tied to the disclosures [7].
5. Key stories and the impact of joint reporting
The initial Guardian disclosures included phone-record collection orders, PRISM collaboration with tech firms, and internal NSA tools such as Boundless Informant and XKeyscore; subsequent stories — many produced in concert with U.S. press partners — documented NSA ties to Silicon Valley and international fallout including diplomatic rows and official inquiries [1] [11] [3]. The combined reporting forced congressional scrutiny, public debate, and policy conversations about surveillance [1].
6. Disagreements, differing accounts and limits of available sources
Sources in this set describe The Guardian’s centrality and partnership with Greenwald and Poitras, and they document collaboration with U.S. outlets, but they do not provide a full internal editorial timeline or the complete mechanics of how every document was vetted across newsrooms [4] [5]. Some reporting emphasises The Guardian’s leadership; others note that multiple outlets — for example The Washington Post and The New York Times — produced major companion stories and sometimes disputed approaches to publication [7] [5]. Available sources do not mention the full set of security protocols used by each newsroom beyond references to encrypted communications and secure handoffs [8] [10].
7. Why this collaborative model mattered
Sharing selected documents and coordinating publication across The Guardian, U.S. papers and independent journalists broadened scrutiny, distributed legal and operational risk, and amplified impact: the stories reached global audiences and prompted diplomatic incidents, official denials and eventual policy debates about NSA practice [1] [12]. At the same time, the Guardian’s public account highlights the trade-off newsrooms face between exposing secrets in the public interest and managing legal and state-pressure consequences [6] [3].
Conclusion: The Guardian’s collaboration with Snowden and with journalists such as Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras combined on-the-ground meetings in Hong Kong, secure handoffs of thousands of documents, coordinated reporting with partner outlets, and sustained investigative follow-up — producing a cascade of revelations about NSA surveillance while triggering direct government pressure and long-term debate about secrecy and privacy [8] [6] [1].