Was the Hawaiian tragic model photo of Trump accurate
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Unredacted photos released by Democrats from the Jeffrey Epstein estate include an image of a young Donald Trump standing among six women wearing what appear to be Hawaiian leis; multiple outlets report the women were Hawaiian Tropic models and adults, not identified as victims [1] [2] [3]. Media commentary and social posts briefly suggested the redacted faces might indicate underage victims or Epstein survivors, but mainstream follow-ups — citing the New York Post, The Telegraph and others — quote at least one woman saying she was 22 at the time and describe the group as adult models at a Mar‑a‑Lago Hawaiian Tropic event [4] [3] [5].
1. Photo context: what was released and what’s visible
Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released a small set of images from the Epstein estate; among them is a photo showing Trump flanked by two women on one side and three on the other, some wearing artificial Hawaiian leis, with the faces of the women redacted in the committee release [1] [6]. News outlets that obtained unredacted copies describe the same scene and note the redactions are confined to the women, not to Trump [5] [2].
2. The core claim: were the women underage or Epstein victims?
Initial broadcasts and social posts implied redactions could indicate the subjects were minors or survivors. One MSNBC legal commentator reportedly said the image “suggests” Trump was with “minors and/or survivors,” a framing later criticized as inaccurate [7] [4]. Follow-up reporting in outlets that obtained unredacted images characterizes the women as adult Hawaiian Tropic models present at a Mar‑a‑Lago event, which directly challenges the initial implication [3] [5].
3. Eyewitness and outlet reporting that supports the ‘models’ account
The Telegraph and other outlets that reviewed exclusive images quote at least one woman who said she was 22 at the time and remembered Trump as “very nice” and “gentlemanly,” and identify the women as representing Hawaiian Tropic at a Mar‑a‑Lago event [8] [3] [5]. The New York Post and other outlets that obtained unredacted images also reported the subjects were “adult women models” [5] [2].
4. Why faces were redacted — interpretation and competing explanations
House Oversight’s public release included redactions; outlets and critics argue those redactions fueled misinterpretation and political theater, with Democrats releasing the photos ahead of a Justice Department deadline possibly to increase pressure [6] [1]. Available sources do not specify the committee’s exact legal or privacy rationale for blacking out the women’s faces; the reporting documents the effect — that redactions prompted speculation — but does not provide the committee’s stated justification [6] [1].
5. Misinformation dynamics: how the narrative hardened quickly
After the redacted images circulated, social posts and partisan sites amplified the claim that Trump was pictured with underage victims; several conservative and pro‑Trump outlets and accounts countered promptly, calling the story a “hoax” and pointing to the model explanation and the New York Post exclusives [4] [9]. Media fact‑check follow‑ups and news reports corrected or questioned the more sensational interpretations — for example, CNBC and Yahoo summarized that unredacted photos show adult models and that the initial suggestion of minors was incorrect [10] [7].
6. What this does and does not prove about Trump’s conduct
Reporting confirms Trump was photographed with Epstein and with a group identified by multiple outlets as Hawaiian Tropic models at or near Mar‑a‑Lago; that alone does not establish criminal conduct or complicity in Epstein’s crimes, and several outlets note that being photographed with Epstein-era associates does not equal culpability [2] [7]. Available sources do not claim the images prove any criminal behavior by Trump; they simply document his presence in photos from Epstein’s estate [2] [6].
7. Takeaway for readers and the record
The best-supported account in current reporting is that the Hawaiian‑lei photo shows Trump with adult Hawaiian Tropic models at a Mar‑a‑Lago event, not with identified minors or known Epstein victims — a conclusion repeated by multiple outlets that reviewed unredacted images and by quoted participants [3] [5] [8]. At the same time, the decision to release redacted images without fuller context produced rapid, partisan misreading; the committee’s motives and the exact legal reasons for redaction are not detailed in these reports [6] [1]. Readers should treat the photo as evidence of association in a social setting, not proof of criminal conduct, and note how redaction and rapid social amplification can create misleading public narratives [6] [4].