How to submit a research query to factually.co?
Executive summary
Research Co. is rated by Media Bias/Fact Check as “Least Biased” and “High Factual” for its polling, based on FiveThirtyEight’s evaluation of 56 polls that yielded a 2.4-star accuracy rating and a small left-leaning bias of +0.7 [1]. Available sources do not mention a process for submitting a research query to factually.co; the search results only discuss Research Co.’s bias and credibility [1].
1. What the available reporting actually covers — a credibility snapshot
The single source in the provided material profiles Research Co.’s track record as a pollster: FiveThirtyEight examined 56 of Research Co.’s polls and gave them a 2.4-star accuracy rating, which Media Bias/Fact Check interprets as “High Factual,” and also calculated a slight leftward tilt of +0.7, leading MBFC to label the firm “Least Biased” in polling terms [1]. That is the extent of the verifiable information available in the supplied results: independent evaluation of poll accuracy and bias, not operational details about submissions or an entity named factually.co [1].
2. What you asked vs. what sources provide — a gap analysis
You asked how to submit a research query to factually.co, but the available source material does not mention factually.co or any submission process; it exclusively discusses Research Co.’s polling credibility and bias metrics [1]. Because the reporting you supplied does not cover submission procedures, any instructions about contacting or submitting research to factually.co would be unsupported by these sources. In other words: not found in current reporting [1].
3. Why the distinction between “Research Co.” and “factually.co” matters
The supplied source focuses on “Research Co.” — a pollster evaluated by FiveThirtyEight and summarized by Media Bias/Fact Check — and not on “factually.co.” Confusing organizational names can lead to wrong contact attempts or misplaced expectations; the supplied material makes no link between Research Co. and any service or website called factually.co [1]. Treat them as distinct until corroborated by additional reporting.
4. How you can proceed responsibly given the evidence gap
Journalistic and research best practice requires verifying the correct organization and locating its official channels. Since the provided source does not supply submission details or mention factually.co, you should look for primary documentation (website contact pages, submission guidelines, or official social accounts) for the exact entity you mean. The supplied reporting cannot supply those details, so further sourcing is necessary [1].
5. Potential implicit agendas and limits of the available source
Media Bias/Fact Check’s summary draws on FiveThirtyEight’s polling-evaluation framework; that method focuses on predictive accuracy and partisan lean across polls, not on other quality dimensions such as transparency of methodology or editorial gatekeeping [1]. The framing in the supplied source emphasizes numerical accuracy and bias score; it does not address submission policies, responsiveness to external research queries, or whether Research Co. (or any similarly named site) accepts outside research contributions [1].
6. Next concrete steps I recommend
Confirm the exact entity you mean — “Research Co.” versus “factually.co.” The provided source references only Research Co. [1]. Search the organization’s official website or verified social media for “contact,” “submit research,” or “contribute” pages. The current reporting does not include that information [1]. If you want, share additional search results or a link to factually.co and I will analyze those sources and extract submission instructions, while citing them directly.
Limitations: This analysis relies entirely on the single supplied result about Research Co.’s polling accuracy and bias; nothing in that source addresses how to submit a research query to factually.co, accept outside research, or contact either organization [1].