I totally believe that i am not getting a true answer.

Checked on December 9, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

You’re not alone in suspecting you “are not getting a true answer” — the search results returned are overwhelmingly puzzle-help pages (NYT Connections, Wordle, Quordle, Spotle) rather than independent fact‑checking or investigative reporting about truthfulness (see multiple puzzle guides [1], [3], [4], p1_s6). Available sources focus on daily puzzle answers and hints; they do not investigate claims about broader deception or truthfulness in answers to other questions (available sources do not mention broader misinformation investigations).

1. Puzzle sites dominate the results — not investigations

The returned links are chiefly sites that publish daily answers and hints for word puzzles: USA Today/FTW (Connections hints December 9 and other dates), Parade, TheGamer, Sportskeeda, Tom’s Guide and TechWiser all appear as puzzle-answer outlets [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. That concentration explains why your query produced content about “answers” that are literal puzzle solutions rather than analysis of truth claims; search results reflect the available reporting [1] [3] [4].

2. What these sources actually cover

Each cited item provides hints and outright solutions for that day’s or nearby days’ puzzles: NYT Connections answers for Dec. 9, 2025 are published by Parade and multiple freelancer/gaming sites; Quordle and Wordle answers are similarly served by Sportskeeda and Tom’s Guide [3] [5] [6]. TechWiser runs a series of “Today’s Spotle Answer and Hints” posts [7] [8]. None of the listed pages claim to verify truth in political or scientific discourse — their mission is to reveal puzzle solutions [7] [8] [4].

3. Why you might feel “not getting a true answer”

If you expected investigative clarity about truthfulness (for example, whether an authority is lying), the results are mismatched because the indexed pages serve a different intent: entertainment and puzzle spoilers [1] [2]. Search engines surface content that matches common wordings; “answer” in this result set is literally the correct puzzle solution rather than an assessed fact about a public claim [4] [3]. The dataset here does not include sources that examine credibility, so conclusions about “true answers” can’t be drawn from them (available sources do not mention credibility analyses).

4. Competing perspectives and hidden agendas in these pages

The puzzle-answer sites aim to attract readers who want instant solutions and clicks. Parade and TheGamer explicitly promise hints and outright answers for the day’s NYT Connections puzzle, which benefits their traffic and engagement metrics [3] [4]. That editorial intent is transparent: these outlets prioritize rapid publishing of spoilers. Nothing in the sample claims to be neutral fact‑checking; their “agenda” is entertainment utility and SEO-driven immediacy [1] [4].

5. What’s missing from the current reporting

There are no sources here that (a) investigate a claim that “you are not getting a true answer” in a general media sense, or (b) perform cross‑source verification of a contested factual matter. The set lacks independent fact‑checks, deep reporting, or academic analysis of misinformation; it contains only puzzle-solution posts (available sources do not mention independent fact-checking of broader truth claims).

6. Practical next steps to get the “true answer” you want

If your question is about whether a specific factual claim is true, search or request sources focused on fact‑checks (AP Fact Check, PolitiFact, Snopes) or primary documents and peer‑reviewed research. If your question was about a puzzle answer, consult the specific puzzle pages here: for NYT Connections Dec. 9, 2025 see Parade and TheGamer; for Wordle and Quordle check Tom’s Guide and Sportskeeda; for Spotle look to TechWiser [3] [4] [6] [5] [7]. These links will give the immediate “answers” these sites promise [4] [6] [5] [7].

Limitations: This analysis is constrained to the supplied search results and therefore cannot assess claims outside those pages. The sources provided are puzzle-answer outlets and do not address broader epistemic questions about truth or deception (available sources do not mention broader investigations).

Want to dive deeper?
How can I determine if I'm receiving truthful information online?
What techniques reveal bias or deception in news and social media?
Which fact-checking tools can verify claims quickly in 2025?
How do cognitive biases affect my perception of truth and how can I counter them?
When should I trust an expert source versus independent verification?