Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Is Blendr News a credible source ?
Executive summary
Available search results show multiple sites with “Blender” in their name that are established community outlets (blender.org, BlenderNation, BlenderArtists, BlenderToday) and at least one site called “The News Blender” that states a conservative orientation (thenewsblender.com/about) [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. The query “Is Blendr News a credible source?” is not directly addressed in the returned items; available sources do not mention a site explicitly named “Blendr News,” so this analysis compares similarly named outlets and flags gaps in coverage (not found in current reporting).
1. Naming confusion: many different “Blender” brands, few references to “Blendr”
Search results return official Blender Foundation pages (blender.org) and community outlets such as BlenderNation, Blender.Today and BlenderArtists, plus a separate site called The News Blender — but none of the provided pages refer to “Blendr News” or “Blendr” spelled without an “e” [1] [2] [4] [3] [6]. Therefore the first credibility risk is misidentification: a reader might conflate official Blender Foundation communications with unrelated sites that have similar names; available sources do not mention a “Blendr News” entity (not found in current reporting).
2. Official Blender Foundation and community outlets: indicators of credibility
Blender’s official site and press pages are institutional and show affiliations with known organizations and partners (membership in ASWF, Khronos, Linux Foundation and OIN; corporate patrons listed on press pages), which are conventional markers of organizational legitimacy [1] [7]. Community platforms such as Blender.Today and BlenderArtists are described as community-driven or forums for announcements, which suggests open contribution models rather than centralized editorial oversight [4] [3]. These facts support credibility for blender.org and long-established community outlets because they have clear organizational ties and a visible ecosystem [1] [2].
3. Independent sites with explicit viewpoint disclosures
The site “The News Blender” includes an “About” page that explicitly states most contributors have a conservative worldview and frames the site’s purpose as blending news with civic education; that disclosure is an editorial transparency cue but also signals a partisan viewpoint readers should account for [5] [6]. When evaluating credibility of any outlet, declared bias matters: transparency about perspective is useful, but readers should treat ideological sites as opinionated and cross-check factual claims with neutral or primary sources [5].
4. Reputation and longevity signals in the results
CGPress calls itself an independent CG news site with over 15 years in the business and claims a reputation for credible, independent coverage; this kind of longevity and self-description are traditional proxies for reliability, though the claim itself is self-reported in the snippet [8]. BlenderNation’s archive and long history (site news dating back many years) are also indicators that it has been a longstanding hub for Blender-related news [9] [2]. These items show that reputation can be inferred from tenure and community recognition in the provided pages [8] [9].
5. Technical disruptions and site reliability are separate from editorial credibility
TechRadar reported that the blender.org site was taken offline after a cyberattack in 2021 but noted most infrastructure continued to operate; technical outages affect availability and trust in terms of reliability but do not by themselves invalidate editorial content [10]. This distinction is important if “credible” is taken to mean “reliable access” as well as “factually accurate.”
6. How to judge the unknown “Blendr News” in practice
Because the provided sources do not mention “Blendr News” explicitly, the safe approach is: (a) confirm the exact URL and ownership of the entity you mean (available sources do not mention it), (b) check for transparency (about page, editorial team, funding) as The News Blender does when it discloses political leanings [5], (c) cross-verify factual claims with primary or widely recognized independent outlets such as official blender.org press pages or established tech and industry reporting [7] [1], and (d) treat community-driven feeds as useful for leads but verify breaking claims before relying on them [4] [2].
7. Bottom line for readers and researchers
If you mean the official Blender ecosystem—blender.org, BlenderNation, Blender.Today and BlenderArtists—those are established community and project sources with institutional affiliations and long track records [1] [2] [4] [3]. If you mean “The News Blender,” note it discloses a conservative viewpoint and should be read with that context in mind [5]. If you mean “Blendr News” spelled without the “e,” available sources do not mention that specific name and you should provide the URL or sample article so its credibility can be assessed against these criteria (not found in current reporting).