Is global news trustworthy
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Public trust in news is mixed and shifting: Reuters Institute finds rising reliance on social and video platforms and growing doubt about news trustworthiness, with 58% of people unsure they can tell truth from falsehood online [1] [2]. Major surveys show wide variation by country—Edelman reported a 52% average trust across 28 countries in 2025 while Reuters’ Digital News Report and VisualCapitalist highlight widespread low confidence outside a few markets [3] [4] [5].
1. Why “Is Global News Trustworthy?” is the wrong single question
Trust in “the news” is not uniform; it depends on country, platform and outlet. The Reuters Digital News Report shows structural change: traditional TV, print and online sites are losing reach while social and video platforms rise — and people say those platforms are less trustworthy [4] [2]. Aggregated measures like Edelman’s 52% average mask big national differences, so asking whether “global news” is trustworthy skips the key variation across markets and channels [3].
2. Platforms drive perception more than bylines
Multiple sources point to platform effects: social media and aggregators now deliver a larger share of news yet are widely seen as less reliable, which drags down overall confidence even when legacy newsrooms remain robust in some places [2] [1]. Reuters found that rising consumption on video and social correlates with greater uncertainty about accuracy and transparency — respondents said AI and platform-driven content could make news less trustworthy [2].
3. Polls show both decline and pockets of resilience
Different indices tell different stories. Reuters’ Digital News Report highlights falling engagement and the public’s difficulty distinguishing truth online (58% unsure) [1]. VisualCapitalist and YouGov summaries characterize confidence as low in most countries but note exceptions. Meanwhile, WAN‑IFRA cites Edelman’s 52% average trust in 28 countries and argues that, globally, trust has sometimes improved in the last five years—so narratives of universal collapse are overstated [5] [3].
4. Trust varies by outlet — not all “news” equals the same reliability
Independent evaluators score outlets differently. Ad Fontes and Media Bias/Fact Check assess specific brands (here, Global News as an example): Ad Fontes rates Global News “Reliable” with middle bias while Media Bias/Fact Check labels it left‑center but generally trustworthy for factual reporting [6] [7]. These audits show that mainstream outlets can be reliable even when perceived trust in the broader ecosystem is shaky.
5. Misinformation and structural pressures are real and measurable
Reporting shows concrete impacts: declining newsroom resources and a rush to click‑driven formats increase sensationalism and reduce thorough fact‑checking, eroding confidence [5]. The Reuters report documents the rise of “alternative media ecosystems” and political groups turning to online personalities as “truth‑tellers,” which fragments audiences and trust [1].
6. What readers can do — practical, evidence‑backed steps
Sources imply clear actions: prefer established outlets with documented fact‑checking records; check platform provenance (social post vs. newsroom story); use multiple outlets across different countries or editorial lines to triangulate; and watch for third‑party credibility ratings and indexes [6] [8] [9]. The Digital News Report underscores that public uncertainty about detecting falsehoods is high, so media literacy matters [1].
7. Competing narratives and why they matter to you
Journalistic and industry voices disagree about the trajectory: some (e.g., Reuters/YouGov coverage) stress declining trust and structural risk from social platforms, while others (WAN‑IFRA citing Edelman) point to pockets of rising or stable trust and warn against generalizing U.S. trends globally [1] [2] [3]. These competing frames reveal implicit agendas: platform critics press for regulation; industry groups highlight resilience to defend institutions; survey sponsors may emphasize different headline numbers.
8. Bottom line: nuanced skepticism, not blanket cynicism
Available sources do not support a single answer that “global news” is uniformly trustworthy or untrustworthy. Trust depends on where you get your news, which country you’re in, and which outlets you consult. The evidence shows rising platform risk and measurable confusion among audiences globally, but also identifies reliable mainstream outlets and improvements in some national contexts [1] [3] [6]. Use source checks and cross‑verification rather than a binary trust verdict [2] [8].