Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Is the la times a left wing newpaper

Checked on November 15, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Major third‑party media‑bias evaluators generally rate the Los Angeles Times as left‑leaning or “skews left,” while some commentators argue the notion of a broadly “liberal media” is overstated; specific ratings include Ad Fontes Media’s “Skews Left” and Biasly’s “Somewhat Liberal” assessments [1] [2]. Different projects and commentators reach different conclusions about how meaningful that label is — some academic guides and analysts place mainstream outlets toward the center‑left in audience trust and perception [3].

1. How third‑party scorers classify the LA Times — data first

Independent media‑rating organizations that analyze content and patterns have placed the LA Times on the left side of the spectrum: Ad Fontes Media explicitly labels the Los Angeles Times “Skews Left” while also rating it Reliable for analysis and fact reporting [1]. Biasly’s methodology — combining algorithmic and human analyst scores — rates the LA Times as “Somewhat Liberal,” concluding the paper provides coverage from a slightly liberal perspective [2].

2. What those labels mean in practice — methodology matters

These classifications reflect methodologies that weigh story selection, framing, language and historical patterns; Ad Fontes uses sampled article ratings on a left‑right scale and a reliability axis [1], while Biasly blends automated scoring with analysts who average multiple political perspectives [2]. Because methods differ, “skews left” or “somewhat liberal” signals a tendency in coverage patterns, not an absolute political agenda — ratings track relative position, not a definitive partisan manifesto [1] [2].

3. Audience perception and academic surveys — leanings vs. trust

University and polling summaries find many mainstream outlets are perceived as center‑left by parts of the public; a University of Michigan research guide summarizes Pew findings showing mainstream sources more often rated center‑left or “towards the left” in public perception [3]. That suggests the LA Times’ label fits a broader pattern in which metropolitan papers are commonly seen as slightly left‑leaning by evaluators and audiences [3].

4. Opposing viewpoints — “liberal media” as a contested trope

Some commentators and outlets argue the idea of a single “liberal media” is exaggerated or weaponized. Recent commentary in national outlets contends that accusations of liberal bias have been overstated and politicized, and that the concept has been used as a political cudgel even as media ecosystems shift [4]. Other critics, particularly from conservative watchdogs, document examples they see as persistent liberal slant in mainstream reporting [5]. Both perspectives appear in the literature you provided: one emphasizes the label’s historic overstretch, the other documents continuing perceived bias [4] [5].

5. Limits of the available reporting — what we cannot conclude from these sources

Available sources do not provide a comprehensive, up‑to‑date content audit of every LA Times beat or a timeline of how its coverage may have shifted in recent ownership changes; the cited assessments are snapshot‑based and reflect differing methods [2] [1]. Also, none of these sources in your set definitively prove that individual news reporters at the LA Times deliberately push a partisan agenda — the ratings reflect patterns in selection and framing rather than proven intent [2] [1].

6. Practical takeaway for readers — how to interpret “left‑wing” labels

If you want a short verdict: evaluators generally rate the LA Times as slightly to moderately left of center (Ad Fontes “Skews Left”; Biasly “Somewhat Liberal”) [1] [2]. Treat that as a cue to read critically — compare reporting across outlets with different ratings and pay attention to clear factual reporting vs. opinion pieces. At the same time, recognize debates about “liberal media” remain contested and politically charged; some analysts argue the trope is overblown or weaponized [4] [5] [3].

If you want, I can pull specific recent LA Times articles and compare headlines and framing against other outlets using the methodologies described here to illustrate how those “skews left” ratings are generated (not found in current reporting).

Want to dive deeper?
Is the Los Angeles Times editorially liberal or conservative?
How have the LA Times' political endorsements trended over recent elections?
What are common media bias ratings for the LA Times from independent watchdogs?
How does LA Times news reporting compare to its opinion section politically?
Have ownership or management changes affected the LA Times' political slant?