Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Is the picture of trump and clinton where trump is sucking on Clinton's private parts real

Checked on November 17, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

An authentic 2000 photo of Donald Trump and Bill Clinton laughing together exists in the Clinton Presidential Library collection and was released publicly in 2016 (first frame of viral clip) [1] [2]. Viral short videos and screenshots that show Trump appearing to perform oral sex on “Bubba” are AI-manipulated; fact-checking reporting says the moving images beyond the original photo were generated by an artificial-intelligence tool and are not real [2]. Available sources link the viral claim to a March 2018 Epstein-era email that mentions “the photos of Trump blowing Bubba,” but they do not establish that any authentic sexual image showing Trump and Bill Clinton exists [3] [4].

1. The original still image is real — but it’s ordinary and dated

The Clinton Presidential Library holds photographs from 2000 showing Bill Clinton and Donald Trump together — including a frame where Trump’s hand seems to reach toward Clinton’s lower torso; these images were publicly released and archived by the Clinton Library and first circulated broadly in 2016 [1] [5]. Getty Images and other photo repositories also index many authentic photos of Trump with the Clintons, confirming the provenance of still images from that era [6] [7].

2. Viral “oral sex” moving clips are AI-modified, not original film

Multiple fact-checks and reporting identify the viral six‑second clip that purports to show Trump performing oral sex on Bill Clinton as AI-generated video. The first frame is the genuine 2000 photo, but subsequent frames are synthetic: background details change in ways inconsistent with authenticated photos, indicating manipulation with an AI tool [2]. The Yahoo! fact-check explicitly states the moving video beyond the first frame is fabricated [2].

3. Why the Epstein email mention fuels speculation — and why that’s not proof

A March 2018 email from Mark Epstein to his brother Jeffrey — later released among Epstein-related documents — includes the line asking Steve Bannon if “Putin has the photos of Trump blowing Bubba,” which resurrected a wave of online speculation about who “Bubba” meant and what photos might exist [4] [3]. News outlets note “Bubba” is often a nickname for Bill Clinton, but Mark Epstein told reporters that the referenced person was not Clinton, and multiple outlets say the line is ambiguous rather than evidentiary [8] [9]. Snopes confirms the email’s authenticity but says the identity and meaning are unverified [3].

4. Reporting disagrees about the identity of “Bubba”; sources are explicit about limits

Newsweek, Times Now, Metro, LGBTQ Nation and other outlets report the email and that social media users equated “Bubba” with Bill Clinton, but some reporting quotes Mark Epstein denying that identification or refusing to provide details, and outlets caution that the email alone does not prove the existence of such photos [8] [9] [10]. The public documents do not include any verified sexual photograph of Trump with Bill Clinton; reporting explicitly frames the email as speculative [4] [11].

5. How to read viral images responsibly: provenance and forensic cues

Journalistic and fact-check sources point to two practical signals of manipulation in this case: [12] the moving clip’s later frames diverge from authenticated photos (a disappearing background figure, altered shadows), and [13] the only verified asset published by the Clinton Library is a still photograph from 2000 — not a sequence showing sexual contact [2] [1]. Those are the basis for fact‑checkers concluding the explicit video is AI-created and not authentic [2].

6. What’s not in the reporting and the remaining unknowns

Available sources do not mention any verified, original sexual photo showing Trump and Bill Clinton together; the Epstein emails raise questions but provide no photographic evidence in public files [4] [3]. If other materials exist, they have not been identified in the current reporting; outlets explicitly emphasize the gap between the email’s claim and verifiable proof [8] [11].

Conclusion: The still photo of Trump and Clinton from 2000 is real and archived by the Clinton Library, but the sexually explicit moving images circulating online are AI-generated alterations of that photo; the Epstein-era email mentioning “photos of Trump blowing Bubba” fuels speculation but does not serve as authenticated evidence that such photos exist [1] [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
Is the viral image of Trump and Clinton sexually explicit or a digitally altered composite?
Which fact-checking organizations have investigated the Trump-Clinton sexual image and what did they find?
Can reverse image searches and metadata reliably prove whether a political image is doctored?
What legal or platform policies apply to pornographic deepfakes of public figures?
How common are AI-generated sexual deepfakes of politicians and how can the public spot them?