What were the exact results of trumps grades per kimmel are the legit?

1. Kimmel’s “grades for Trump” are comedic commentary, not documentary evidence

Jimmy Kimmel’s mentions of Trump’s grades, SAT scores or school transcripts appear on late‑night shows as jokes or sketches. TIME’s roundup of late‑night segments describes Kimmel (and peers) speculating and joking about why Trump’s NYMA transcripts might be hidden and even staged a faux superintendent bit, framing it as satire rather than a factual release of records ^[1]. The Guardian’s report about Kimmel assigning a grade to Trump’s first 100 days — “somewhere between F and U” — is explicitly presented as a comic line in a monologue ^[2]. Those sources treat Kimmel’s claims as performance, not primary-source reporting ^{[1] [2]}.

2. There’s no reporting here that Kimmel produced or authenticated Trump’s transcripts

None of the supplied reporting says Kimmel produced or authenticated Trump’s school records or grades. TIME recounts late‑night hosts guessing about transcripts and includes a satirical guest playing an NYMA superintendent; it does not say Kimmel obtained official documents ^[1]. Therefore, the exact numeric grades or SAT scores “per Kimmel” are not documented in these sources as verifiable facts — they exist as jokes and hypothetical sketches ^[1].

3. Two separate threads: historical jests ^[3] and current political jabs ^[4]

The TIME piece references the 2019 era of late‑night hosts speculating about Trump’s school records amid Cohen testimony; those were theatrical sketches and gags about transcripts ^[1]. Separate coverage from 2025 depicts Kimmel lampooning Trump’s performance in office (grading the “first 100 days”) and challenging Trump on cognitive-test claims; those are topical comedic responses, not archival claims about school grades ^{[2] [5]}. Treat these as distinct rhetorical moves: older satire about school records, and newer political comedy about presidential performance and health claims ^{[1] [2] [5]}.

4. How news outlets frame Kimmel’s lines — satire vs. allegation

TIME and The Guardian frame Kimmel’s remarks as late‑night entertainment: speculative, satirical and part of a broader pattern of late‑night hosts mocking public figures ^{[1] [2]}. Other outlets in the provided set document a broader feud between Kimmel and Trump — including suspensions, Truth Social posts and threats — which puts Kimmel’s jokes in a contentious political context where both sides weaponize commentary ^{[6] [7]}. That context matters for readers assessing whether to treat a late‑night quip as reportage.

5. Competing perspectives and key limitations in the sources

One perspective treats Kimmel’s comments purely as comedy with no claim to primary‑source evidence (TIME, The Guardian) ^{[1] [2]}. Another perspective in the dataset highlights a political tit‑for‑tat between Trump and late‑night hosts, showing Kimmel’s lines can have real consequences (suspension, Trump attacks) and be amplified politically (Deadline, Axios, BBC) ^{[6] [8] [9]}. The supplied sources do not include any independent verification of Trump’s exact grades or SAT scores, nor do they claim Kimmel provided authenticated documents — that information is simply not found in current reporting ^{[1] [2]}.

6. Practical takeaway for readers

If your question is whether Kimmel’s on‑air “grades” are legitimate academic records: the sources show they are comedic commentary and not authenticated school records ^{[1] [2]}. If you’re seeking the actual, official grades or SAT scores, available sources provided here do not supply those documents or verified numbers and therefore cannot confirm any “exact results” attributed to Kimmel ^{[1] [2]}.

If you want, I can search for reporting that specifically releases or authenticates Trump’s school transcripts or SAT scores and cite those documents if available.