Have any journalists, fact-checkers, or scholars documented revisions or retractions of Jonathan Cahn's prophetic claims for 2024–2025?

1. What the coverage shows: prolific prophecy, frequent updates and media promotion

From late 2024 into 2025 Cahn produced many public prophetic messages (end‑of‑year roundups, urgent warnings, and book releases) that were carried by ministry platforms, sermon archives and Charisma Media, which repeatedly published his prophetic takes on Trump, Israel, lightning signs and end‑times themes ^{[4] [2] [1]}. Charisma and related outlets also report Cahn “updating” material as events unfolded — he told Fox News he “had to keep on updating the book because of that” while writing The Dragon’s Prophecy ^[1].

2. No evidence in these sources of independent fact‑check retractions or scholarly post‑mortems for 2024–25

The search results include many of Cahn’s own messages and supportive Christian outlets, plus critical summaries and profiles, but none of the provided items is a journalistic fact‑check or academic paper documenting that a specific 2024–2025 prophetic claim was later retracted or formally revised by Cahn or by independent analysts (available sources do not mention a documented retraction by journalists, fact‑checkers, or scholars in 2024–2025) ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

3. Internal corrections and cautions within Cahn’s own sphere

Even within the material linked to Cahn’s ministry and Charisma, there is evidence he sometimes cautions against date‑setting and says he updates work as events occur; for example, Charisma pieces in 2025 quote Cahn warning against fixing a date for the rapture and saying he “kept on updating” his book as events unfolded ^{[5] [1]}. This suggests a practice of revision or situational reframing inside his own messaging channels rather than formal external retractions ^{[1] [5]}.

4. Where critics appear and what they say (in provided sources)

Some critical voices in the provided sources characterize Cahn’s method as sensational or speculative; Monergism’s profile calls his approach prone to sensationalism and theological distortion and even labels him a “false teacher,” though that is an evaluative judgment rather than a documentation of a specific failed prophecy or retraction ^[6]. The presence of critical religious commentary indicates debate about method and accuracy but does not in these sources show systematic fact‑checking follow‑ups of particular 2024–25 prophecies ^[6].

5. Popularity and platform effects matter for accountability

Cahn’s prophetic content circulated widely through sermon archives, ministry sites and sympathetic outlets (sermons‑online.org, Charisma, Fox News Digital coverage), which can amplify messages while providing limited corrective mechanisms; some sermon pages even show content being removed from YouTube and viewers asking where it went, which raises questions about traceability of specific claims over time ^{[3] [2]}. Those platform dynamics complicate independent verification because original items may be edited, reposted, or taken down without a public correction note ^[3].

6. What a journalist or scholar would need to document a retraction or failed prophecy

To document revisions or retractions one would need: a clear original dated claim; a subsequent, dated public correction by the claimant or the publisher; and independent verification of the claim’s falsity or non‑occurrence. The provided set contains many original claims and updates but lacks the independent journalistic/fact‑checking artifact that matches those three elements for 2024–2025 (available sources do not provide that chain) ^{[1] [5] [2]}.

7. Bottom line and next steps if you want deeper verification

Based on the sources here, there is no documented external fact‑check or scholarly catalogue of Cahn’s 2024–2025 prophecies being retracted. If you want a definitive audit, the next step is to assemble (a) archived copies of specific dated claims, (b) the later versions/edits (if any) on the original platforms, and (c) independent fact‑checks or academic critiques — none of which appear in this result set (available sources do not mention such an audit) ^{[4] [1] [3]}.