Examples of Julie Green's failed or fulfilled predictions

1. The headline failures reporters keep pointing to

Major outlets and critics highlight a handful of clear, concrete claims by Green that did not happen: she publicly said King Charles would “never be king” or would have the Queen murdered — assertions that were widely mocked when the monarchal transition proceeded without those outcomes ^{[3] [1] [8] [4]}. Journalists framed these as emblematic examples because they are specific, easily falsifiable, and connected to global news events, making them frequent touchpoints in coverage ^{[1] [4]}.

2. Election predictions that missed their marks

Green publicly foretold electoral victories—for example telling supporters that Doug Mastriano and Maryland’s Dan Cox were anointed to win their races—and those candidates lost, which critics and pundits used to argue her prophetic claims were unreliable ^[5]. Commentary outlets also report a broader pattern: Green was part of a cluster of pro-Trump prophets who predicted a 2022 Trump return to the White House “100%,” a promise critics say went unfulfilled and damaged her credibility among skeptics ^[2].

3. The Biden-dead and other extraordinary conspiracy-style prophecies

Multiple news pieces document Green’s more outlandish assertions — including that the “real Joe Biden” was dead and replaced by an actor and that Barack Obama controlled a body double — which mainstream outlets treat as conspiracy claims rather than verifiable prophecy ^{[9] [1]}. Media coverage points to these as examples of how her prophecies intersect with political misinformation trends ^[9].

4. Supporters, the prophetic industry, and why failures don’t end influence

Analysts and commentators explain that within parts of the charismatic-prophetic ecosystem, failed predictions do not necessarily erase a prophet’s influence: Green continues to post lists of prophecies on Julie Green Ministries’ site and retains an audience that reads her statements as spiritual guidance rather than literal forecasting ^{[6] [7]}. Critics argue this dynamic lets ambiguous or symbolic pronouncements persist despite empirical failures ^[7].

5. Critics’ pattern: vagueness, partisan reading, and selective interpretation

Across critiques, a consistent line is that many of Green’s prophecies are vague, politically resonant, or phrased so they can be reinterpreted after events — a feature critics say protects them from easy falsification ^{[1] [4]}. Commentators also note she “reads and reflects the larger environment” and that her messages often amplify the hopes and grievances of a political constituency, which helps explain both her reach and the fierce pushback from opponents ^[7].

6. Catalogs, rebuttals and internal debates in religious communities

Some evangelical and faith-focused websites debate whether missed predictions disqualify a prophet; one faith-oriented analysis assembled questions about prophetic accuracy and noted arguments on both sides, including calls that failed prophecies should discredit a self-proclaimed prophet ^[10]. That source also emphasizes debates within Christian communities about standards for prophecy and how to treat prophetic figures who make political claims ^[10].

7. Takeaway: documented failures, ongoing influence, and limits of available reporting

Reporting documents specific, high-profile failed or unfulfilled predictions by Julie Green — including royal, electoral, and presidential-body-double claims — and also shows she retains followers and a public platform ^{[1] [5] [9] [6]}. Available sources do not provide a comprehensive catalogue of every prediction she made or a systematic tally of fulfilled versus failed prophecies; they focus on prominent examples and on the social and political consequences of those predictions ^{[7] [10]}.

If you want, I can extract and list each publicly reported specific prediction (with the source that reported it) and mark whether the available reporting treats it as fulfilled, unfulfilled, or ambiguous.