Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Are there documented timelines comparing Julie Green's predictions to subsequent events?
Executive summary
Available sources in the current search set do not include systematic timelines comparing Julie Green’s public predictions to later events; instead, the lone result is a devotional/critique piece that discusses her prophetic claims and raises the familiar problem of missed predictions in other prophets (e.g., Jeane Dixon) while urging caution about accepting new prophets [1]. That article frames Julie Green within a broader religious and apologetic debate about prophecy accuracy and biblical tests for false prophets [1].
1. What the single available source actually is — and why that matters
The only provided document is a MarketFaith Ministries post that asks “Who Is Julie Green, and Is She a True Prophet?” and offers theological critique and pastoral commentary rather than a scholarly timeline or empirical audit of predictions [1]. Because this source is an opinion/faith-based blog, it emphasizes doctrinal criteria (Deuteronomy 18) and pastoral warnings about following modern prophets rather than compiling date-stamped predictions and measuring hit rates [1]. That genre matters: devotional writing can highlight concern about prophetic claims but does not substitute for a neutral, timestamped comparisons database.
2. What the article says about missed and unmentioned predictions
The MarketFaith piece explicitly compares the problem of assessing prophets to past examples, arguing some well-known prognosticators “missed the most important events” (it cites Jeane Dixon’s failure to predict major late-20th-century events) and uses that analogy to question Julie Green’s credibility [1]. The post states that prophets who make predictions that do not come true should be rejected according to Deuteronomy 18, signaling the author’s theological standard for evaluation rather than offering an empirical scoring method [1].
3. What the article does not provide — gaps you should note
The source does not provide a documented, date-by-date timeline that maps Julie Green’s individual prophecies to subsequent outcomes, nor does it offer statistical analysis, primary-source transcripts of her prophecies, or independent verification of prediction timing and wording (not found in current reporting). The article also does not present counter-evidence from supporters who might catalogue hits, explain ambiguous language, or provide criteria for what counts as fulfillment (not found in current reporting) [1].
4. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas in the piece
MarketFaith Ministries writes from a conservative Christian, doctrinal perspective and applies biblical tests for prophets; its implicit agenda is protecting readers from what it regards as misleading or dangerous spiritual claims, which colors its critique of Julie Green [1]. The article also includes comments and pastoral admonitions that defend prophetic calling in some cases, showing internal debate within the site’s readership — occasionally supportive language appears alongside skepticism [1]. Readers should expect the piece to prioritize theological correctness over neutral investigative methods.
5. How someone could build the timeline you asked about — and why independent documentation is essential
To create a reliable prediction-vs.-outcome timeline, researchers would need primary-source records of each prediction with timestamps (video, audio, or dated transcripts), objective criteria for what constitutes fulfillment, and independent verification of subsequent events and dates. The available source does not supply these materials or a methodology, so it cannot serve as that timeline (not found in current reporting) [1]. Any future timeline should transparently state inclusion rules to avoid moving goalposts or confirmation bias.
6. Practical next steps for deeper inquiry
If you want a documented comparison, seek out (a) archived videos, dated posts, or transcripts of Julie Green’s public statements; (b) independent fact checks or timelines produced by journalists or academics; and (c) responses from both critics and supporters that cite specific dates and language. The MarketFaith piece can frame theological concerns but cannot be used alone to adjudicate predictive accuracy [1].
Limitations: conclusions above are based solely on the single search result provided (MarketFaith Ministries); no independent timelines, databases, or primary-source compilations of Julie Green’s predictions appear in the supplied material [1].