Has Julie Green predicted events related to US politics?
Executive summary
Julie Green has made multiple high-profile political prophecies — including claims that Joe Biden is a body double, that the U.K.’s Prince Charles would murder Queen Elizabeth, and calls for a U.S. “overthrow” or “reinstatement” of government favoring MAGA allies — all reported by major outlets (Rolling Stone) and international press (Times of India) [1] [2]. Supporters describe her as a prophetic voice who issues political revelations on podcasts and livestreams, while critics note vagueness and failed predictions in past cases [3] [1].
1. Who Julie Green is and where she speaks from
Julie Green is a self-described prophet and evangelical broadcaster who runs Julie Green Ministries International, using daily podcasts and streaming channels to deliver “direct revelations” that frequently target political figures and events; MarketFaith describes her primary platform as a daily podcast and streaming ministry [3]. Rolling Stone and other outlets have documented her appearances at political events and connections to MAGA-aligned figures, indicating her prophecies circulate beyond religious audiences into partisan political spaces [1].
2. Specific, widely reported political predictions
Reporting documents several named, attention-grabbing claims: Green alleged the “real Joe Biden is dead” and accused Barack Obama of controlling a Biden body double; she publicly predicted that Prince Charles would murder Queen Elizabeth; and she forecast that certain political figures (including Nancy Pelosi) would be removed before midterm elections [1]. Independent coverage also captured a New Year’s prophecy in which Green called for a “reinstatement,” “shift of power,” and an “overthrow” leading to “a new government in control,” language framed by Times of India as promising an imminent MAGA-favored takeover [2].
3. How sources frame accuracy and vagueness
Journalists and faith-focused critics take different tacks. Rolling Stone highlights the sensational and specific nature of some claims while noting their implausibility and political alignment [1]. MarketFaith’s analysis emphasizes that while much of Green’s rhetoric is delivered as divine revelation, many prophecies are “fairly vague” though some “have been pretty direct,” and notes instances of failed predictions as grounds for skepticism [3]. This produces competing frames: adherents treat statements as direct prophecy; skeptics emphasize ambiguous wording and unfulfilled forecasts [3] [1].
4. Political context and circulation of the prophecies
Green’s messages have reached political audiences: she has been associated with MAGA figures and had media moments tied to campaigns and conservative commentary, increasing their political impact beyond church pews [1] [2]. Times of India and other outlets flagged her rhetoric about governmental “overthrow” amid larger debates about post‑2020 election narratives and calls for reinstatement circulated in some pro‑Trump circles [2]. Available sources do not mention whether her predictions influenced any specific official actions or votes.
5. Critiques, followers, and the question of evidence
Critics documented by MarketFaith and Rolling Stone argue Green’s method resembles historical televangelist prophecy — mixing vague pronouncements with occasional specific claims that invite verification — and point to failures as evidence of unreliability [3] [1]. Supporters and some guests on her show treat her words as divinely sanctioned, suggesting partisan confirmation bias shapes reception [3] [2]. Sources do not provide a systematic tally of hits vs. misses for her prophecies; MarketFaith notes some specific failed prophecies but does not enumerate all outcomes [3].
6. Why this matters for U.S. politics
When prophetic claims explicitly predict regime change, targeted deaths, or the delegitimization of elected officials — as Green’s statements have at times done — they intersect with political mobilization and conspiracy ecosystems; outlets have highlighted that dynamic by reporting both the content and the political platforms amplifying it [1] [2]. At the very least, Green’s pronouncements contribute to a media environment where religious authority and partisan aims can reinforce each other; available sources do not claim she alone precipitated any concrete political event.
7. What to watch next
Monitor mainstream reporting and faith‑community analyses for follow‑ups: major outlets (illustrated by Rolling Stone’s investigation) will likely flag any new specific, falsifiable predictions or appearances tied to campaigns [1]. Faith‑oriented sites such as MarketFaith provide internal critiques and believer responses that illuminate how prophetic claims are received within religious subcultures [3]. Times of India’s coverage shows how these messages travel internationally and become part of broader reporting on U.S. political fringe movements [2].
Limitations: this summary relies on the supplied reporting and faith‑community commentary; sources do not contain a comprehensive, dated archive of every Julie Green prophecy or a complete success/failure ledger [3] [1].