Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: The Just Stop Oil movement has targeted big oil companies multiple times, but this was not covered by the media
1. Summary of the results
The original statement is demonstrably incorrect regarding media coverage. Just Stop Oil (JSO) received extensive media attention through various high-profile protests, including:
- Throwing soup at paintings and targeting art galleries [1]
- Blocking the M25 motorway [2]
- Disrupting sporting events like snooker championships [3]
- Protests at the Bafta Awards, Ashes cricket match, Les Miserables performance, and actions at Stonehenge [4]
The group's actions generated such significant media coverage that they became "impossible to ignore" [5], with over 60% of the UK public being aware of their protests [2].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Several important contextual elements were omitted from the original statement:
- Scale of Impact: The movement resulted in over 3,000 arrests, indicating the significant scale of their activities [6]
- Strategic Media Engagement: JSO deliberately chose disruptive tactics to generate media attention [3]
- Public Response: Their actions sparked "fierce debate" about protest tactics [6]
- Media Framing: Different media outlets portrayed the protests in various ways, suggesting nuanced coverage rather than a media blackout [7]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The statement appears to promote a false narrative of media suppression, which could serve several interests:
- Activist Narrative: The claim of media silence could be used to justify more extreme protest tactics, despite evidence that disruptive actions already receive substantial coverage [3]
- Public Perception Management: The statement ignores that JSO's tactics generated "angry headlines" [5], suggesting an attempt to downplay negative media coverage rather than acknowledge its existence
- Strategic Misrepresentation: The claim contradicts the documented media strategy of JSO, which specifically aimed for and achieved widespread coverage through deliberately disruptive actions [1]
The evidence from multiple sources consistently shows that far from being ignored by the media, JSO's protests were extensively covered across various platforms and outlets, making the original statement's claim of media silence fundamentally misleading.