Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Kanye west paid 8 million for a superbowl ad for a website that only sells a shirt with a swastika on it

Checked on February 12, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The statement contains both accurate and inaccurate elements. Kanye West did purchase Super Bowl advertising for Yeezy.com [1], but the claimed $8 million price tag is incorrect. The ad was actually a local spot running in specific markets like Los Angeles, Philadelphia, and Atlanta, likely costing "a few hundred thousand dollars" rather than $8 million [1] [2]. The ad featured West in a dentist's chair [3] and was reportedly shot on an iPhone [1].

It is confirmed that after the ad aired, the Yeezy.com website was indeed modified to sell only a $20 white t-shirt featuring a swastika [1] [4]. The shirt was labeled "HH-01," which the Anti-Defamation League interprets as code for "Heil Hitler" [5] [6].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual elements are missing from the original statement:

  • The website was subsequently taken down by Shopify for violating their terms of service and not engaging in "authentic commerce practices" [3] [4]
  • The ad was strategically placed in specific major markets rather than being a national buy [2]
  • The website modification occurred within an hour of the commercial airing [4]
  • By Tuesday morning, the site was listed as "unavailable" [7]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The main misinformation in the original statement concerns the advertising cost. By claiming an $8 million price tag, the statement potentially exaggerates the scale and reach of West's campaign. This could serve to:

  • Overstate West's financial commitment to spreading antisemitic messaging
  • Create a false impression about the scale of the ad campaign, which was actually limited to local markets [2]
  • Distract from the more concerning aspects of the incident, such as the deliberate nature of the website modification and the apparent Nazi references in the product coding [5]

The statement also fails to mention the swift action taken by Shopify to remove the website, which provides important context about corporate responsibility and consequences for hate speech.

Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?