Which media reports detail the largest anonymous donations to both the Renee Good and Jonathan Ross crowdfunding pages?
Executive summary
Major outlets reported large sums flowing to both Renee Good’s family fundraiser and multiple campaigns tied to ICE agent Jonathan Ross, and several pieces noted that many donations were made anonymously—but none of the provided reporting documents specific, named “largest anonymous donations” to both pages; instead reporting highlights total tallies and some named donors such as Bill Ackman to the Ross campaign [1] [2] [3].
1. What the press says about the Good family fundraiser’s biggest receipts
Reporting across Newsweek, the Star Tribune and other outlets emphasized that the verified GoFundMe for Renee Good’s family amassed a seven‑figure total—widely reported as roughly $1.5 million—before organizers closed that particular page, but those stories do not enumerate individual anonymous gifts or identify a single “largest anonymous donation” behind that total [1] [4].
2. What the press says about donations to Jonathan Ross’ pages
Coverage of online fundraising for Jonathan Ross focuses on the aggregate growth across GoFundMe and GiveSendGo—numbers cited range from several hundred thousand to over $1 million across platforms—and singles out at least one named, non‑anonymous donor, billionaire Bill Ackman, who is reported to have given $10,000 and amplified the unverified Ross GoFundMe by sharing it on X [3] [2] [5].
3. The crucial absence: no outlet in the provided reporting documents specific large anonymous gifts
Multiple outlets explicitly note that “most” donations were anonymous or that thousands of contributions came from users listed as anonymous, but in the reporting provided no media piece discloses the identity or size of particular anonymous donations described as the “largest”; the stories therefore cannot substantiate claims about the single biggest anonymous gifts to either the Good family page or the Ross campaigns [6] [7] [8].
4. How named donations were covered and why they matter to the narrative
Journalists highlighted named contributions when available—most prominently Ackman’s $10,000 to the Ross page—because named high‑profile donations change visibility and traction for fundraisers; outlets such as Forbes, Newsweek and the Star Tribune reported Ackman’s role in boosting the Ross drive and contrasted it with the verified, closed Good family fundraiser that had already raised about $1.5 million [3] [2] [4].
5. Platform context and editorial choices that shape reporting of anonymity
News pieces also pointed to GoFundMe’s policies and the platform’s review of the Ross page, which explains why some stories emphasize totals and platform decisions over tracing anonymous donors—platform privacy norms and the practical limits of newsroom investigations mean reporters commonly report aggregate sums and any public, named donors rather than identifying who gave anonymously unless the donor self‑discloses [9] [10].
6. Alternative readings and possible agendas in the coverage
Some outlets adopt a consumer‑watch or policy angle—criticizing GoFundMe for hosting a legal‑defense style fundraiser or questioning consistency with terms of service—while others foreground political optics by underscoring that a wealthy, partisan donor amplified the Ross campaign; those editorial frames affect whether reporting dwells on totals, on named benefactors, or on the anonymous majority of small gifts [9] [3] [6].
7. Bottom line for the specific question asked
Based on the supplied reporting, the media accounts that best detail large donations are the pieces noting the roughly $1.5 million total raised for Good’s family and the named $10,000 donation from Bill Ackman to an unverified Ross GoFundMe; however, none of the provided stories documents a particular “largest anonymous donation” for either the Renee Good or Jonathan Ross pages—reporting only that many donors were anonymous and that totals and a few named gifts drove visibility [1] [2] [3] [6].