Did Laura Ingram;s interview with Elon Musk on the detox for the liver; and is it legit
Executive summary
There is no credible reporting among the provided sources that Laura Ingraham conducted a real interview with Elon Musk about a “detox for the liver”; what the record does show is Ingraham and Musk appearing together on conservative programming about political topics, and at least one active scam using deepfaked clips of high‑profile figures (including fake Musk and a fake Ingraham segment) to sell a health product [1] [2] [3] [4]. Given the available evidence, a purported Ingraham–Musk liver‑detox interview circulating online is not supported by legitimate news coverage and matches patterns of deceptive commercial deepfakes documented in consumer complaints [4].
1. What the verifiable reporting actually documents
Fox News has run segments featuring Laura Ingraham discussing Elon Musk and his public interventions—most recently breaking down Musk’s departure from DOGE and airing exchanges where Musk criticized USAID that Ingraham amplified on The Ingraham Angle—coverage confirmed by Fox’s video posting and independent summaries in outlets like Yahoo and TheWrap [1] [2] [3]. Archive footage of The Ingraham Angle shows Ingraham framing interviews and commentary as attempts to “cut through” mainstream narratives, which is consistent with the political tone of the documented segments [5].
2. Evidence pointing to a fake commercialized “interview” about a liver detox
Consumer reviews and scam‑alert threads identify a live, deceptive marketing campaign that embeds an obviously doctored video — featuring “fake Elon Musk, fake RFK Jr., and a fake Laura Ingraham Fox news segment” — on landing pages for products such as TryHealthyFlow (tryhealthyflow.com), and that scam is explicitly called out in Trustpilot commentary [4]. The Trustpilot entry notes the video is embedded on a fraudulent “CNN Health” page and that the deepfake is being used to sell supplements, indicating the clip’s purpose is commercial deception rather than legitimate journalism [4].
3. Why the “detox” interview is unlikely to be legitimate based on the record
None of the sourced coverage documents or corroborates any legitimate Fox News or other mainstream interview in which Ingraham and Musk discuss a liver‑detox product or regimen; the verifiable segments cited concern political topics (DOGE, USAID) rather than health endorsements [1] [2] [3]. Where consumers and watchdogs flag a video that does show Ingraham and Musk in a health‑product ad, reviewers explicitly call it a deepfake scam, which is a common tactic to lend bogus authority to dietary supplement sales [4]. Reporting on viral misinformation also highlights how reputable names and clips can be repurposed or misremembered in the wild, reinforcing that absence of mainstream coverage is meaningful [6].
4. Motives, agendas and the ecosystem that enables such fakes
The available sources illustrate two intertwined pressures: high‑profile personalities are frequently repackaged by partisan media for political messaging (Ingraham’s treatment of Musk on matters like USAID and DOGE) and bad actors exploit recognizable faces to boost fraudulent commercial conversions online (deepfake ads pushing supplements) [1] [2] [3] [4]. Consumer reviewers and misinformation analysts warn that these scams capitalize on trust in public figures and audiences’ low propensity to verify quickly, a dynamic called out in commentary about viral misinformation practices [6] [4].
5. Bottom line — is the Ingraham–Musk liver‑detox interview legit?
Based on the sourced record, there is no legitimate, documented Ingraham interview with Musk about a liver “detox”; instead, there is documented political coverage of Musk on Ingraham’s program and independently reported instances of a scam using deepfaked clips to market supplements, which strongly suggests that any viral “interview” about a detox is not bona fide and is at least in some cases a manufactured ad [1] [2] [3] [4]. Where the provided sources do not include definitive forensic analysis of every viral clip, that absence is noted; however, consumer reports and the mismatch between known legitimate topics and the alleged health claim weigh decisively against the clip being authentic [4] [6].