LHT standard footer.
Executive summary
The phrase "LHT standard footer" returns a mix of unrelated results: product pages and company sites rather than a clear stylistic or legal "standard footer" specification. Search hits include a handheld-transmitter product page from Evolution Motion labeled "LHT" (no footer guidance) [1], Lufthansa Technik-related PDFs and site content that include organizational contact lines and document footers [2] [3], and unrelated pages that merely contain "LHT" in titles [4] [5]. Available sources do not define a single, agreed "LHT standard footer" template or rule.
1. What search results actually show — a scattershot of "LHT" uses
The top results do not point to a unified footer standard. Evolution Motion’s product page titled "LHT Handheld Transmitter" is a commercial product listing and contains product copy but no corporate footer template or style guidance [1]. Lufthansa Technik material appears elsewhere in the results — a PDF of AMO operations specifications includes contact lines and brief document footers (email and control/effective dates) but not a published "footer standard" document [2]. A Lufthansa Technik example site similarly shows a standard corporate homepage header and footer content structure, but the page is an example app and not a formal style guide [3].
2. Two likely interpretations users may mean by "LHT standard footer"
One plausible interpretation is a request for Lufthansa Technik (commonly abbreviated LHT) corporate footer wording or legal notices. The AMO operations PDF demonstrates that Lufthansa Technik documents often include contact emails and control/revision/effective date lines in the footer area (harald.gloy@lht.dlh.de; TTCAA Control/Revision/Effective Date) [2]. Another reading is a product- or brand-specific footer for items named "LHT" (e.g., product pages such as the LHT handheld transmitter), but the Evolution Motion product page contains product copy without explicit footer rules [1]. Sources do not converge on a single template.
3. What the Lufthansa Technik materials actually show
The Lufthansa Technik operations PDF provides concrete examples of footer elements used on official documents: author/contact email, authority control identifiers, revision and effective dates, and page numbering [2]. This suggests that for regulatory or technical documents associated with Lufthansa Technik, footers emphasize traceability and compliance metadata rather than marketing disclaimers [2]. The company example homepage shows typical corporate footer elements (company descriptors, services, navigation), but the page is an example app and not an authoritative style manual [3].
4. Absence of a formal "LHT standard footer" specification
No result among the provided sources publishes a formal "LHT standard footer" specification or template to copy. The product pages and unrelated entries (capacitor series LHT, riflescope LHT, calendars, radio) use "LHT" as an acronym or model name but do not include a cross‑industry footer standard [4] [5] [6] [7]. Therefore, any definitive template cannot be extracted from current reporting: "not found in current reporting."
5. Practical guidance based on observed patterns
If you seek a footer suitable for Lufthansa Technik operational documents, mirror elements present in the AMO PDF: include a responsible contact email, the issuing authority, document control number, revision status, effective date, and page numbering for traceability [2]. For a corporate website footer, emulate the example app’s pattern: company summary, services, navigation links and legal contact points — but note the example is not a formal style guide [3]. For product pages (e.g., LHT handheld transmitter), standard practice is to use generic site-wide footer content (copyright, privacy, contact) rather than product-specific legalese; the Evolution Motion page shows product-focused marketing content and relies on the site’s global footer for legal links [1].
6. Conflicting uses and why ambiguity persists
" LHT" is a shared acronym and model name across industries (aviation, electronics, optics, calendars, radio), so search results mix unrelated pages. That heterogeneity explains why no single footer standard emerges from the results: each organization applies its own footer conventions based on regulatory needs (aviation documents) or marketing/site design (product pages) [2] [1] [4] [5].
Limitations: the sources supplied do not include a dedicated style guide or legal template labeled "LHT standard footer," so any recommended template above is inferred from observed examples rather than an official specification [2] [3]. If you can provide the specific organization (for example, Lufthansa Technik vs. a product manufacturer) I can extract and draft a footer that more closely matches their documented practice from available files.