What mainstream media investigations have compiled lists of Julie Green’s specific failed predictions?
Executive summary
Three mainstream outlets have been identified in the reporting as compiling or summarizing Julie Green’s public prophecies and highlighting how many did not come true: Rolling Stone ran a detailed piece cataloguing multiple specific predictions (including allegedly murderous claims about Prince Charles and prognostications about CNN and prominent politicians) [1], Media Matters collected several of her dark forecasts and quoted them in a separate dispatch referenced by other commentators [2], and Diana Butler Bass’s Substack notes that pieces in Media Matters, Rolling Stone and the Washington Post examined Green’s record of “wrong” prophecies [2]. The publicly available reporting beyond those named outlets includes fact-checking and commentary sites that repeat and expand the lists, but the core mainstream compilations named in the coverage are Rolling Stone and Media Matters, with the Washington Post cited as having written on the subject in the same conversation [1] [2] [3].
1. Rolling Stone’s inventory: explicit, sensational, and sourced to Green’s own videos
Rolling Stone published a lengthy investigative feature that pulled quotations and clips from Julie Green’s videos to assemble a list of her more consequential and specific prophecies — examples cited in that article include Green’s claim that “CNN will claim bankruptcy,” a prediction that Nancy Pelosi “will pass away” before the 2022 midterms, an assertion that Prince Charles would have his mother murdered, and the wider assertion that the “real Joe Biden is dead” with an impersonator controlled by Barack Obama [1]. Rolling Stone framed those items as concrete, checkable predictions and explicitly linked them to Green’s own ministry output and her appearances in political settings, such as speaking at Doug Mastriano events [1]. Those compiled lines are presented as failed or unfulfilled where time and facts have not borne them out, as documented in the piece [1].
2. Media Matters: selective compilation used to illustrate a pattern
Media Matters is repeatedly referenced in the coverage as having excerpted a cluster of Green’s “dark prophesies” — specifically the outlet’s dispatch is quoted for highlighting claims about Pelosi, members of Congress, and other partisan targets whom Green said would be “cut down” or otherwise removed [2]. The Diana Butler Bass commentary characterizes Media Matters as part of a media trend that catalogued Green’s incorrect prophecies and used them to criticize the interplay of prophecy and partisan politics [2]. The available snippets show Media Matters functioning as a compilation source within the broader media conversation rather than the sole originator of many of the cited lines [2].
3. Washington Post and other mainstream mentions: attribution and limits
Diana Butler Bass’s Substack states that reporting about Green appeared in Media Matters, Rolling Stone, and the Washington Post, and she uses that claim to discuss the cultural reaction to Pentecostal prophecy [2]. The sources provided here do not include the Washington Post article text itself, so while the Post is named by Bass as participating in this media sweep, that specific Post investigation cannot be directly examined or quoted from within the supplied reporting [2]. This gap means the asserted involvement of the Washington Post rests on Bass’s summary of the media landscape rather than on an independently supplied Post link in the provided material [2].
4. Other outlets and the boundary between mainstream reporting and partisan commentary
Beyond Rolling Stone and Media Matters, fact-check and partisan-leaning sites repeated and expanded lists of Green’s failed prophecies — Factkeepers summarized several of the most sensational claims (Schumer and Pelosi deaths; Charles murdering the Queen; Biden allegedly dead and controlled by Obama) [3], and other outlets like WeGotThisCovered offered commentary on her unfulfilled predictions and political influence [4]. Those pieces amplified the same roster of specific predictions but are not universally classified as “mainstream” in the same way as Rolling Stone or Media Matters; they functioned more as aggregation, commentary, or partisan amplification of the items Rolling Stone and Media Matters had already catalogued [1] [3] [4].
In sum, the clearest mainstream compilations documented in the supplied reporting are Rolling Stone’s detailed catalogue [1] and Media Matters’ dispatchs excerpting multiple big-ticket prophecies [2], with Diana Butler Bass asserting that the Washington Post also joined that coverage though the specific Post piece is not present among the supplied sources [2]. Other outlets and fact-checkers reproduced and broadened the lists, but those two outlets — Rolling Stone and Media Matters — are the principal mainstream investigations named in the available reporting [1] [2] [3].