Which major U.S. outlets are rated center or least biased across multiple 2025 media-bias audits?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Multiple 2025 media-bias audits place a handful of U.S. outlets in the “center” or “least biased” categories, but the groups disagree on scope and method: AllSides lists dozens of audited outlets as Center and now issues a Balance Certification to select organizations such as Verity and Straight Arrow News (AllSides audits, July–May 2025) [1] [2]. Ad Fontes Media’s chart and audits find many websites/print sources — especially local outlets — among the least biased and most reliable in 2025, and single-program analyses (cable shows) can rate different programs on the same network very differently [3] [4] [5].
1. What the big audits actually say about “center” and “least biased”
AllSides’ public audits and Balance Certification highlight outlets rated “Center” after multipartisan editorial reviews; recent examples named in 2025–2026 press coverage include Verity and Straight Arrow News, each described as meeting AllSides’ Balance Certification criteria after audits that produced near-zero bias scores [1] [2]. Ad Fontes Media’s Media Bias Chart and its web/print releases show many local and national web/print outlets clustering in a low-bias, high-reliability zone and explicitly call websites/print the “least biased and most reliable” platform category in their March–April 2025 updates [3] [4]. Ad Fontes has also published program-level audits for cable news, ranking NewsNation weekday programs among the least biased for cable news in one 2025 study [5].
2. Why lists differ: different methodologies drive different “least biased” outcomes
Auditors use different samples and rubrics. AllSides combines crowd-sourced public ratings with a multi-partisan panel and editorial reviews and issues Balance Certification for outlets that meet strict balance criteria [6] [7]. Ad Fontes rates individual articles or episodes via panels representing left, center and right and averages bias and reliability scores across samples, which emphasizes content-level reliability and yields a separate “least biased” placement particularly for web/print and some programs [8] [3]. Media Bias/Fact Check and other aggregators apply different labeling bands and scoring systems; these methodological differences explain why an outlet can be “Center” on AllSides but sit elsewhere on another chart [9].
3. Which major U.S. outlets repeatedly appear as relatively centrist or low-bias in 2025 reporting
Available reporting in the provided sources highlights a few names: Reuters and the Associated Press are cited as Center in context of aggregator audits; AllSides’ audits and charts list Reuters among commonly recurring Center outlets [10]. Newsweek is widely reported as retaining a Center rating in an AllSides Media Bias Audit announced in 2025 [11] [12] [13]. Ad Fontes emphasizes a wide set of web/print outlets and local newspapers as least biased overall but does not publish a single shortlist of national “top” least-biased outlets in the snippets provided [3] [4]. Note: a full cross-check of multiple audit lists for a compiled “who’s center across all audits” is not present in the supplied sources; available sources do not mention a consolidated 2025 list that harmonizes AllSides, Ad Fontes and MBFC rankings.
4. What to watch when you read an audit or chart
Audits vary by sample frame (articles vs. programs), timeframe, and whether they weigh audience perception (crowd ratings) or analyst panels — AllSides highlights crowd and panel methods, Ad Fontes emphasizes analyst panels and per-piece scoring, and Ad Fontes’ web/print releases stress local outlets’ favorable scores for reliability [6] [8] [3] [4]. Aggregator or press releases from outlets (e.g., Newsweek) often emphasize their own reaffirmed Center rating; treat those as secondary confirmation of an audit but not independent aggregation [11] [12].
5. Competing perspectives and hidden incentives
Auditing bodies promote different missions: AllSides markets Balance Certification as a service newsrooms can pursue to bolster credibility [1] [7]. Ad Fontes sells access and subscriptions for deeper chart data and highlights different platform classes [3]. Media outlets publicizing audit results may have an implicit PR motive in amplifying favorable ratings (e.g., Newsweek press releases about an AllSides Center rating) [11] [12]. Readers should be conscious that being “Center” is not a guarantee of perfect coverage; AllSides itself warns that Center “does not mean better” and that consuming a variety of perspectives remains necessary [7] [6].
6. Practical reading advice: how to use these audits as a consumer
Use audits as tools, not verdicts: cross-check an outlet’s rating across auditors when possible, inspect the auditor’s methodology (AllSides’ crowd-plus-panel approach; Ad Fontes’ article-level analyst scoring), and prioritize outlets that score highly for factual reliability in addition to low bias — Ad Fontes singles out web/print and local outlets as often more reliable in 2025 [3] [4]. If you want a short takeaway from the supplied reporting: Reuters/AP-style wire services and several outlets audited by AllSides (for example Newsweek, and smaller, recently certified outlets such as Verity and Straight Arrow News) appear in these 2025 audits as Center or Balance-Certified, while Ad Fontes highlights many local web/print outlets as least biased overall [10] [11] [1] [2] [3].
Limitations: this analysis uses only the provided search results; a comprehensive cross-audit roster of “major U.S. outlets rated center across multiple 2025 audits” is not directly available in the supplied sources and would require compiling full datasets from each auditor (available sources do not mention a single harmonized 2025 cross-audit list).