What statements or writings have led to claims that Mamdani is antisemitic?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Critics say Zohran Mamdani’s record on Israel and some campaign-era rhetoric produced the bulk of accusations that he is antisemitic — notably his support for BDS, his reluctance to disavow the slogan “Globalize the intifada,” and instances media and watchdogs flagged as mocking Jewish holidays — while supporters and some commentators call those charges politically motivated and deny evidence of antisemitic intent [1] [2] [3]. Mamdani has repeatedly condemned acts of antisemitic violence — calling a Bondi Beach/Hanukkah massacre “a vile act of antisemitic terror” and denouncing swastika vandalism in New York as “disgusting and heartbreaking” — which his defenders point to as proof against the label [4] [5] [6] [7].
1. The core grievances: policy positions and contested language
Much of the public case that Mamdani is antisemitic is rooted in his outspoken criticism of Israel: his backing of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement (BDS), his statements qualifying Israel’s right to exist (he has said Israel has a right to exist but not necessarily “as a Jewish state”), and his association with the phrase “Globalize the intifada,” which many Jews and critics interpret as a call to spread violent uprising; Mamdani has, at times, declined to explicitly condemn that phrase, and opponents have repeatedly cited those stances in arguing he crosses the line from policy critique into hostility toward Jewish civic life [1] [8] [2].
2. Specific incidents cited by critics
National monitors and conservative commentators flagged particular episodes: one influential charge was that Mamdani “promoted material that mocked Hanukkah,” cited by a policy group as an example of behavior national antisemitism monitors highlighted; opinion writers and some Jewish communal leaders also pointed to his equivocations on violent rhetoric and his support for BDS as evidence that his rhetoric has had a chilling effect for Jewish New Yorkers [2] [1].
3. Public condemnations of antisemitic violence — the counterargument
Mamdani has issued public, unequivocal condemnations of antisemitic attacks. After a Hanukkah massacre in Bondi Beach he called the attack “a vile act of antisemitic terror,” and he denounced swastika vandalism at a Brooklyn Jewish school as “disgusting and heartbreaking,” pledging to protect Jewish New Yorkers; these statements are cited by his supporters to rebut claims of antisemitism [4] [5] [6] [7].
4. Political context: campaigns, opponents and motive attribution
Several commentators argue accusations emerged as campaign tactics. The Guardian and other outlets note that allegations of antisemitism became central to efforts to curb Mamdani’s candidacy and that some critiques were “absurd” or politically motivated; others — including Jewish communal organizations — expressed genuine fear about his positions on Israel and the potential for policy impacts in New York [9] [8] [10]. This split underscores that charges are as much political messaging as they are strictly about antisemitic beliefs.
5. Disputes over definitions: criticism of Israel vs. antisemitism
A major fault line in reporting is definitional: advocacy groups and analysts who defend Mamdani argue criticism of Israeli policy, support for Palestinian rights, or labeling Israel’s actions “genocide” do not equal antisemitism; critics counter that certain rhetoric — support for BDS, failure to denounce violent slogans, or rhetoric that appears to single out Jewish institutions — can cross into delegitimization of Jewish people or institutions and thus meet some working definitions of antisemitism [3] [2] [1].
6. What available sources document — and what they do not
Available sources document Mamdani’s policy positions (BDS support, critical statements about Israel’s status), specific instances where he declined to repudiate “Globalize the intifada,” claims that he promoted material mocking Hanukkah flagged by some monitors, and his public condemnations of antisemitic attacks [1] [2] [10] [4] [6]. Available sources do not mention a pattern of direct antisemitic slurs by Mamdani or evidence that he personally engaged in violence; they also do not settle the interpretive dispute about whether his positions constitute antisemitism under widely accepted definitions (not found in current reporting).
7. Bottom line for readers
The allegations that Mamdani is antisemitic rest largely on his hardline positions toward Israeli policy, selective campaign-era episodes (mocking material, equivocations on violent slogans), and political opponents’ framing; his unequivocal public condemnations of antisemitic attacks complicate a simple judgment. Readers should weigh (a) the substantive difference between criticizing a state and targeting a faith community, and (b) the political incentives driving allegations, as documented in the reporting [2] [9] [8].