67
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The term "67" (also written "6-7" or "six-seven") emerged as a dominant internet meme and Dictionary.com’s 2025 Word of the Year, driven by a viral song and youth hand-gesture culture; Google added an Easter egg in December 2025 that makes the screen shake when users type "6-7" or "67" [1] [2]. The meme provoked real-world effects — from In‑N‑Out removing order number 67 after disruptive crowds to politicians jokingly invoking the phrase — and has been widely described by outlets as part of "brain rot," the broader spread of low‑brow digital content [1] [2].
1. How "67" went from a lyric to a cultural contagion
A song released by artist Skrilla in late 2024 supplied the lyric that seeded the meme; by 2025 the phrase "6-7" had become a shorthand youth cultural marker, supported by viral clips (including a boy nicknamed the "67 Kid") and an associated hand gesture that mimics the meme's motion [1] [2]. Media coverage framed the phrase as both ubiquitous and evasive — Dictionary.com named "6‑7" its Word of the Year to capture the trend rather than to define a single meaning [1].
2. Tech platforms and corporate reactions: a feedback loop
Tech companies and brands responded to the meme in ways that amplified it. Google implemented an Easter egg in December 2025 so that typing "6‑7," "67," or "6 7" makes a user’s screen shake, deliberately referencing the gesture tied to the meme [2]. Corporations faced operational headaches: In‑N‑Out removed order number 67 from its ticket system after mobs of teenagers began flooding restaurants when the number was announced, an example of how an online joke created real‑world disruption [1] [2].
3. Media framing: "brain rot" vs. cultural play
Multiple outlets linked the 67 meme to the larger phenomenon labeled "brain rot," a pejorative term for fast‑consumed, low‑effort digital content deemed of poor quality; Business Insider and others placed the meme within that critique [2]. Yet coverage also noted playful readings: linguists and some commentators explored alternate origins and meanings — including speculation by a linguist tying it to police radio codes — and numerous everyday instances show younger users treating it as absurdist ritual rather than substantive messaging [2].
4. Political spillover and symbolic use
The meme crossed into formal spaces: lawmakers from widely different contexts referenced "67" in jest — for example, a state representative used it during a legislative session, and a member of Congress referenced it while presiding over the House — illustrating how internet culture can bleed into institutional arenas and be repurposed as light‑hearted political theater [2]. Coverage documents these moments without implying any coherent political program tied to the phrase [2].
5. Why the meme matters beyond laughs
"67" shows how a deliberately ambiguous token can catalyze networked behavior: viral music, platform Easter eggs, retail adjustments, and political mentions fed a feedback loop that magnified a private joke into public spectacle [1] [2]. That loop matters because it creates real costs — business disruptions, policing challenges, and cultural fatigue — and because it illustrates how tech companies’ small design choices (like Google’s Easter egg) can validate and scale ephemeral trends [2].
6. Limits of current reporting and open questions
Available sources document the meme’s spread, corporate and tech responses, and some interpretive threads, but they do not provide quantitative measures of reach (stream counts, daily search volume) or granular demographic breakdowns of who uses the meme most (not found in current reporting). Sources also do not offer a definitive origin story beyond Skrilla’s song and viral clips; Skrilla himself has declined to pin down a single meaning, and linguists offer competing hypotheses [1] [2].
7. Takeaway: cultural signal or digital noise?
Reporting shows "67" functions as both: a signal of how quickly youth culture can aggregate and transmit a symbol, and a piece of digital noise that commentators call "brain rot" [2]. The phrase’s institutional incursions and the corporate responses documented by media confirm it will be studied as a case of internet culture influencing offline behavior, while the lack of consistent meaning highlights the era’s preference for viral form over fixed content [1] [2].