Have Meghan Markle or her spokesperson commented on reports about her health or surgery?

1. What spokespeople have said — a narrow confirmation

A spokesperson for Meghan confirmed to People that the duchess “has reached out to her father,” a line echoed by outlets including The Daily Beast and People’s reporting of the hospitalisation and amputation ^{[1] [2]}. Multiple pieces say Meghan’s team verified she had tried to establish contact after reading press reports and asked aides to confirm details; some stories add that Meghan emailed her father because she lacked a current phone number ^{[3] [5]}.

2. How the story of surgery and condition is being reported

Reports describe Thomas Markle being rushed to hospital in Cebu where doctors found a blood clot and, according to family members and local reporting, removed his left leg below the knee to save his life; outlets cite family statements and local hospital reporting while noting he has been in ICU or moved to a regular ward ^{[3] [1] [6]}. Coverage cites different stages — emergency surgery, ICU monitoring, then updates of transfer out of intensive care — reflecting evolving hospital reports ^{[7] [6]}.

3. Where accounts diverge — amputation, ICU status, access

Not all outlets use identical language: People and The Daily Beast report a below‑knee amputation and confirm Meghan reached out via a spokesperson ^{[1] [2]}. Other outlets emphasise ICU admission or subsequent transfer and quote family members for condition updates ^{[7] [6]}. Several pieces note uncertainty about whether Thomas actually received Meghan’s message because family members say he does not use email or may lack service ^{[5] [2]}.

4. What Meghan herself has said — available sources do not mention a direct statement

Available sources do not mention a public statement from Meghan Markle herself; instead reporting relies on a spokesperson’s confirmation that she reached out and on family interviews with Thomas Markle Jr. and others ^{[1] [2]}. No direct quote from Meghan appears in the cited coverage.

5. Media context and conflicting agendas in reporting

Coverage mixes confirmations from a spokesperson with sensational family quotes and tabloid framing. Outlets such as Daily Mail, Mirror and News International focus on interpersonal drama and criticism of Meghan for past estrangement, while People and The Daily Beast highlight the spokesperson’s confirmation and the medical facts reported by family ^{[3] [4] [1] [2]}. Critics’ pieces and opinion columns amplify a narrative of perceived hypocrisy; other outlets frame Meghan’s outreach as an attempt at contact amid practical obstacles ^{[8] [2]}.

6. What remains uncertain — gaps to watch

Reports differ on whether the family‑reported amputation and ICU status are final or evolving; some say Thomas “was moved out of intensive care,” others continue to report ICU monitoring ^{[6] [7]}. It is also unclear from current reporting whether Meghan’s message reached Thomas, how the hospital or family have formally responded to her outreach, or whether she will make any further public comment — available sources do not mention those details ^{[5] [1]}.

7. How to read these reports — a quick checklist

Treat the spokesperson confirmation as a narrow fact: Meghan’s office told at least one outlet she reached out ^{[1] [2]}. Treat family and tabloid claims about motives, missed chances, and character judgements as opinion or sourced to relatives and columnists rather than direct statements from Meghan ^{[8] [3]}. Expect further, possibly conflicting updates as hospitals, family members and spokespeople release new information ^{[7] [6]}.

Summary judgement: reporting confirms that Meghan’s representative told at least one major outlet she reached out to her father after the reported emergency surgery and amputation; the medical facts and the interpersonal narrative remain shaped by family accounts and tabloid coverage with some discrepancies across sources ^{[1] [2] [3]}.