Has MeidasTouch disclosed its donors in tax filings or public reports?

Checked on December 15, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

MeidasTouch operates both as a media network and a political committee (a hybrid/“Carey” PAC) that publicly files campaign finance disclosures listing individual donors to its PAC activities; OpenSecrets’ PAC profile and donor pages show detailed donor and expenditure records for MeidasTouch’s PAC (C00746073) for 2020 and 2022 cycles [1] [2] [3]. Reporting and watchdog coverage have raised questions about how MeidasTouch framed money raised from supporters versus funds the PAC itself spent, but sources do not provide a definitive statement that MeidasTouch’s nonprofit media arm disclosed all its funding in IRS tax filings or separate public reports [4] [5] [6].

1. MeidasTouch’s PAC filings are public and catalogued by watchdogs

MeidasTouch operates a hybrid PAC/super PAC whose federal filings — including donor lists and independent expenditure reports — are collected and displayed by watchdog sites such as OpenSecrets; the PAC profile explicitly notes MeidasTouch is a “Carey committee” and shows donor and expenditure records for election cycles [1] [2] [7]. Those PAC-level disclosures are the standard public mechanism by which political committees must report contributors to the Federal Election Commission, and OpenSecrets’ donor pages list hundreds to thousands of individual contributions attributed to the committee [2] [3].

2. Journalistic scrutiny: fundraising language versus who actually gave

Reporting in Rolling Stone documented a distinction between how MeidasTouch described giving money to campaigns and how contributions actually flowed: fundraising appeals that suggested the organization was “giving” money sometimes relied on users clicking links to split donations between campaigns and the Super PAC, meaning individual donors — not the PAC itself — were the source of some campaign donations. Rolling Stone flagged that this dynamic raised questions about whether MeidasTouch’s messaging could mislead donors, even if the arrangements were not illegal [4].

3. Separate media/nonprofit revenue not clearly documented in these sources

MeidasTouch’s media and membership operations (appearing on its own sites and donation pages) solicit contributions that the organization characterizes as supporting journalism or the network; those pages state contributions “do not constitute a charitable donation” but do not appear in the available reporting as IRS Form 990 disclosures or parallel tax filings in the material provided here [6] [5]. Available sources do not mention a public, centralized record in these search results showing that MeidasTouch’s media entity disclosed all donors in tax filings or separate public reports beyond PAC disclosures [6] [5].

4. What the sources confirm — and what they do not

Confirmed by the sources: the MeidasTouch political committee filed campaign finance records that watchdogs (OpenSecrets) have indexed, showing donors and expenditures for election cycles [1] [2] [3]. Not confirmed by the sources: that MeidasTouch’s broader network or nonprofit journalistic activities have published comprehensive donor lists in IRS tax filings or in a standalone transparency report; the materials here do not cite Form 990s or similar nonprofit disclosures [6] [5].

5. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas

OpenSecrets frames these disclosures as public records of political spending and donors [1] [3]. Rolling Stone, writing a critical narrative, highlighted how MeidasTouch’s fundraising phrasing could blur responsibility for donations and potentially mislead supporters — an assessment that points to an implicit fundraising incentive for dramatic messaging [4]. MeidasTouch’s own fundraising pages emphasize support for its journalism and explicitly note contributions are not charitable donations, suggesting a commercial or membership model rather than the traditional nonprofit philanthropy route [6].

6. Bottom line for someone checking disclosure

If your question is whether MeidasTouch’s PAC disclosed its donors: yes — the PAC’s federal filings are public and indexed by OpenSecrets [1] [2]. If your question is whether every financial flow into MeidasTouch’s media/network operations has been disclosed in tax filings or a public transparency report: available sources do not mention comprehensive nonprofit tax disclosures or a single public accounting of all media-side donors [6] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
What is MeidasTouch and what political activities does it engage in?
Which tax forms must political nonprofits like MeidasTouch file and are those filings public?
Have journalists or watchdogs analyzed MeidasTouch donor disclosures and what did they find?
Did MeidasTouch accept donations through affiliated entities that might not appear on main filings?
How do disclosure rules for 501(c)(4), 501(c)(3), and PACs differ and which apply to MeidasTouch?