Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are most common concpiracy theories?
Executive summary
Conspiracy theories are broadly defined as beliefs that two or more actors secretly coordinated to produce a public outcome, and they cluster around predictable themes such as politics, health, science and disaster attribution (Douglas & Sutton definition cited in Homeland Security Newswire) [1]. Reporting and research cited in the available collection show recurring examples: political conspiracies (e.g., election or power-grab claims) [2] [3], medical/health conspiracies (vaccines, withheld cures) [4], and large-scale blame narratives that scapegoat groups for disasters [5] [1]. Available sources do not offer a single ranked “most common” list, but they repeatedly name these thematic categories across outlets [1] [5] [4] [3].
1. What researchers mean by “conspiracy theory” — a working definition
Douglas and Sutton’s concise academic framing—“a belief that two or more actors have coordinated in secret to achieve an outcome, and that their conspiracy is of public interest, but not public knowledge”—is used in reporting to explain why complex domains like climate or disasters attract conspiracism: the subject’s technicality opens space for alternative, simplified narratives (Homeland Security Newswire) [1]. This definition helps explain why the same cognitive pattern shows up across very different topics in the sources provided [1].
2. Political conspiracies: elections, coups, and “elite” plots
Multiple news pieces in the collection highlight political conspiracies as prominent and recurrent. Examples include claims that a sitting president might “retain power by force” after an election, a narrative floated by opponents and reported by US News/AP [2], and broader patterns of election- and leader-focused conspiracy rhetoric cataloged by political blogs and outlets [3]. These stories show both the prevalence and the political utility of conspiratorial claims: they delegitimize opponents and mobilize supporters [2] [3].
3. Health and medical conspiracies: “secret cures” and vaccine narratives
Medical conspiracies are identified as a common type in longer-form explanations of conspiratorial thinking. Science-Based Medicine describes the recurring pattern that “someone” (government, Big Pharma, etc.) is hiding cures or suppressing information—what the author calls the “fallacy of ‘secret knowledge’” [4]. These narratives reappear during public-health crises and persist because they offer simple actors (a corrupt system) responsible for complex problems [4].
4. Disaster and climate conspiracies: hoaxes and manipulated catastrophes
Climate change and disaster reporting in the Homeland Security Newswire article underline how complex scientific explanations enable claims that storms, wildfires or other disasters are manipulated or exaggerated for political ends [1]. The ADL review of mis- and disinformation trends documents how catastrophic events are sometimes blamed on particular nations or groups—examples include false attributions of responsibility for terror attacks or fires to Israel or Zionists—showing how disaster narratives can be weaponized into conspiratorial blame [5].
5. Fringe-to-mainstream dynamics and platform effects
The materials indicate that some theories migrate from fringe to mainstream conversation when high‑profile events or declassifications occur—Blackwell Lab’s piece claims that Pentagon UAP footage and science commentary have pushed certain alien/contact theories toward mainstream discussion, though that article appears promotional and speculative in tone [6]. RAND’s research on detecting conspiracy language highlights that online platforms amplify conspiratorial rhetoric and that machine‑learning tools are being developed to track and counter it [7].
6. Variation over time: are conspiracy beliefs increasing?
Not all sources agree that belief in conspiracies is rising. ScienceDaily summarizes research suggesting conspiracy belief may not have increased overall, complicating simple narratives that social media alone has caused a surge [8]. Journalistic accounts, however, document spikes in particular conspiracy narratives tied to current events [2] [3], indicating that prevalence can be episodic and topic-specific [8] [3].
7. Why these themes repeat — psychological and social drivers
Across the sources, the same drivers recur: complexity of the subject (climate science, pandemics), emotional satisfaction of simpler narratives, and political incentives to mobilize or vilify groups [1] [4] [5]. The New Yorker piece referenced in the collection also traces how modern conspiracism can be more about performance and identity than about providing coherent explanations, particularly when political actors amplify fringe claims [9].
8. Limits of available reporting and cautions for readers
The set of documents supplied does not include a single empirical rank-ordered list of “most common” conspiracies; instead it offers thematic patterns and examples across outlets (available sources do not mention a definitive ranked list). Readers should note differences between scholarly surveys, advocacy reports and promotional or sensational web pages—each has different aims and standards [8] [5] [6].
If you want, I can extract exemplar conspiracy theories mentioned explicitly across these sources and assemble a topic-by-topic list (political, medical, climate, aliens/UAP, antisemitic blame narratives) with the direct citations used above.