Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Has Nick Fuentes said Hitler was good
Executive summary
Nick Fuentes has a documented history of praising Adolf Hitler and expressing pro-Nazi and Holocaust-denying sentiments; multiple outlets report quotes and clips in which he called Hitler “awesome” or “really fucking cool,” and compared Holocaust victims to “cookies in an oven,” prompting widespread condemnation [1] [2] [3]. Reporting shows his praise of Hitler is recurring across years and was central to the controversy when mainstream figures (e.g., Tucker Carlson) interviewed or engaged him, triggering debate inside the Republican movement [4] [5].
1. The basic factual record: public praise and pro-Hitler comments
Longform and mainstream outlets that chronicle Fuentes’s public remarks repeatedly record explicit praise of Hitler. The Guardian reports he “called Adolf Hitler ‘really fucking cool’” and compared the Holocaust to baking cookies [1]. The Washington Post and other outlets note he “once called Adolf Hitler ‘awesome’,” a formulation echoed in reporting about the backlash to his platforming [3]. Investigative pieces also catalogue multiple clips and livestreams in which Fuentes praises Hitler, denies or downplays the Holocaust, or echoes neo‑Nazi talking points [6] [2].
2. Examples cited by reporting: where these claims come from
The claims in contemporary reporting rest on specific livestreams, speeches, and archived clips. The Financial Times–style and investigative reporting cited in [2] documents Fuentes comparing Holocaust victims to “cookies in an oven”; The Atlantic and Haaretz compile clips showing repeated pro‑Hitler comments and Holocaust denial [2] [6] [7]. These examples are publicly available and have been central to news accounts of his influence and the controversies that followed his appearances with higher‑profile media figures [4] [5].
3. How major outlets and commentators reacted
Conservative and mainstream figures reacted strongly when Fuentes received high‑profile platforms. Republicans such as Senator Ted Cruz and groups like the Republican Jewish Coalition publicly condemned platforms that gave Fuentes attention, explicitly citing his praise of Hitler as a reason [5]. The interview by Tucker Carlson prompted internal GOP debate and notable denunciations; some conservative institutions defended free speech or downplayed the reaction, but many commentators labeled Fuentes a “Hitler‑loving” white nationalist [4] [8].
4. Fuentes’s own framing and subsequent claims
Some reporting notes Fuentes has sometimes tried to reframe or minimize past statements; Wikipedia’s recent recounting notes he claimed antisemitic views had “toned down as he aged,” though outlets like The New York Times reviewed his record in contrast to that claim [9]. Available sources do not provide a comprehensive, single Fuentes statement fully recanting praise for Hitler; instead, contemporary coverage emphasizes continuing clips and remarks that contradict any simple narrative of renunciation [9] [6].
5. Why this matters: mainstreaming and political consequences
Journalists and analysts argue that praise for Hitler matters not only as offensive rhetoric but because normalization of such views affects political coalitions and institutions. Multiple outlets tie Fuentes’s pro‑Hitler statements to broader concerns about antisemitism in GOP youth networks, leaks of group chats with pro‑Hitler content, and internal party disputes over platforming and alliances [4] [10] [7]. Reporting also shows his rhetoric helped spark debate about who the conservative movement will tolerate and whether extreme views are being normalized [6] [8].
6. Conflicting perspectives and limitations in coverage
Some defenders of platforming (or commentators emphasizing open discourse) argue interviewers cannot be policed for who they speak to; President Trump later defended Carlson’s right to interview Fuentes, noting “You can’t tell him who to interview” [3]. At the same time, critics emphasize Fuentes’s past statements and documented clips as disqualifying. Available sources do not provide a definitive forensic transcript of every quoted line, nor do they show Fuentes issuing a thorough, unequivocal retraction of his pro‑Hitler statements; reporting instead relies on archived clips, livestream excerpts, and eyewitness accounts compiled across outlets [1] [2].
7. Bottom line for readers seeking a verdict
Reporting across multiple reputable outlets converges on the conclusion that Nick Fuentes has publicly praised Adolf Hitler on multiple occasions and has made Holocaust‑denying or demeaning comparisons; that factual pattern is the basis for why mainstream figures faced backlash for giving him a platform [1] [2] [5]. There are some claims of later moderation by Fuentes, but contemporary journalism reviewed in these sources shows ongoing evidence of praise and denial that undercuts a simple claim he has fully disavowed those positions [9] [6].