Has Nick Fuentes explicitly said the Holocaust did not happen and when did he say it?

1. The sharp claim: Has Fuentes explicitly denied the Holocaust, and where did the words come from?

Multiple outlets report that Nick Fuentes has explicitly denied the Holocaust or its severity, with at least one clear, attributable quote. A July 2023 Fresh & Fit podcast appearance is reported to contain the statement “I don't believe in the Holocaust” and an explicit denial of the commonly cited figure of six million Jewish deaths, giving a concrete timestamp and verbatim line attributed to Fuentes ^[1]. Earlier and later coverage documents him questioning whether gas chambers were used and calling the Holocaust “exaggerated,” language that amounts to explicit minimization rather than neutral historical debate; a Rumble video published March 11, 2024, captures him saying he does not “buy” that Nazis used gas chambers, a direct challenge to core facts of wartime atrocities ^{[2] [3]}.

2. The mosaic of reporting: concrete quotes versus shorthand labeling

Journalistic coverage falls into two patterns: pieces that present direct quotes with dates and pieces that broadly label Fuentes a “Holocaust denier” based on a catalog of antisemitic statements and behavior. Reports from 2022 and 2023 describe his repeated questioning of Holocaust facts and antisemitic ideology without always pinning down a single utterance, and they document institutional responses such as removals from conferences and platform bans ^{[3] [4] [5]}. By contrast, later items including the Fresh & Fit and Rumble citations provide explicit, attributable language and dates — which strengthens the factual basis for the claim that Fuentes has denied or minimized the Holocaust on the record ^{[1] [2]}.

3. Timeline and context: when these denials occurred and how platforms reacted

The reporting spans several years and shows escalation from rhetoric to explicit denials on recorded shows. Coverage from late 2022 and throughout 2023 flags Fuentes’s antisemitic worldview and documents public pushback, including his ejection from CPAC and platform restrictions due to “hateful racist rhetoric” ^{[4] [3]}. The July 2023 Fresh & Fit quote and the March 11, 2024 Rumble clip give concrete moments when Fuentes stated denialist positions in recorded interviews, and subsequent 2024–2025 reporting reiterates those clips while situating them in a pattern of praise for extremist figures and repeated antisemitic commentary ^{[1] [2] [5]}.

4. How different sources frame the same facts — agendas and emphases to watch

Mainstream outlets and watchdogs emphasize explicit quotes and institutional responses to demonstrate harm and explain deplatforming ^{[3] [4]}. Some coverage foregrounds a single quote to anchor the label “Holocaust denier,” while others use cumulative evidence of rhetoric and associations to justify the label without always reproducing verbatim denialist language ^{[3] [5]}. Right-leaning platforms that hosted or amplified interviews may present Fuentes’s comments in wider contexts or as contested claims; left-leaning and anti-hate outlets emphasize factual consensus about the Holocaust and portray Fuentes’s statements as overt denial. Readers should note that both approaches rely on the same documented clips and that explicit denials exist in the public record ^{[1] [2]}.

5. Bottom line: what the evidence proves and what remains important for readers

The available evidence proves that Nick Fuentes has both publicly denied the Holocaust and minimized its mechanisms on recorded platforms, with explicit statements documented in July 2023 and a March 2024 Rumble video where he questioned use of gas chambers. Broader reporting from 2022–2025 catalogues consistent antisemitic rhetoric and institutional pushback that contextualizes those denials ^{[1] [2] [3]}. For readers weighing the claims, the pertinent facts are the recorded, dated statements and the pattern of amplification: those recordings substantiate the label “Holocaust denier,” while the wider coverage explains the consequences and the political dynamics that followed.